***The Official Gun/Ammo Thread***

[extracurRICular]

M&p is very good.

Taking over the Glock market.

little overrated price wise but otherwise most def......

[bigdlb12]

I like em all, performance center corrected a lot of the mistakes of the M&P Shield, love it now

Glock g19 is good too, smooth to carry and not too heavy

I like springfield mod 2 also, I have 2 of them, one in 9mm and .45ACP

[Left Hook Tua]

little overrated price wise but otherwise most def......

It's not that overpriced for a smith and wesson

My smith and wesson 4006 tactical was about a g.

M&p is like 500

[Left Hook Tua]

I like em all, performance center corrected a lot of the mistakes of the M&P Shield, love it now

Glock g19 is good too, smooth to carry and not too heavy

I like springfield mod 2 also, I have 2 of them, one in 9mm and .45ACP

My newest gun is a springfield xd 9mm

[Left Hook Tua]

I wasn't a big fan of the Glock but the only one I shot was old and it was a Glock 17 at the range.

Couldn't hit **** with that thing.


This is the article I got that from.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/multi...uns-under-500/

Glock are fine. Had several.

Last one I had was about 8 yrs ago though.

Glock to me is just not very good looking. They work though.

All the s&w, ruger, walther, hk "glocks" are much nicer looking.

Maybe the Springfield "glock", the xd/xdm is ugly like the glock.

[extracurRICular]

It's not that overpriced for a smith and wesson

My smith and wesson 4006 tactical was about a g.

M&p is like 500

When you compare it to the SDV9 it is damn near the same...and in some respects the SDV9 even outperforms the M&P (IN MY OPINION) yet its $200 dif... ill be honest I've never shot a 4006 Tac...so I wouldn't know bout why you paid what you did....some times mofo's be paying mad money for stupid ****...like lame grips or little marks here and there......

[-MEGA-]

My new baby

[Left Hook Tua]

When you compare it to the SDV9 it is damn near the same...and in some respects the SDV9 even outperforms the M&P (IN MY OPINION) yet its $200 dif... ill be honest I've never shot a 4006 Tac...so I wouldn't know bout why you paid what you did....some times mofo's be paying mad money for stupid ****...like lame grips or little marks here and there......

4006 is an old school pistol. All stainless, all metal, non striker.

Conventional all metal pistols are more expensive than plastic striker fired pistols.

Look at SIG prices or other old school handguns.

Look at the price of Smith and wesson revolvers.

Here was mine.

[Left Hook Tua]

When you compare it to the SDV9 it is damn near the same...and in some respects the SDV9 even outperforms the M&P (IN MY OPINION) yet its $200 dif... ill be honest I've never shot a 4006 Tac...so I wouldn't know bout why you paid what you did....some times mofo's be paying mad money for stupid ****...like lame grips or little marks here and there......

You know what the SD9 is right?

It's the s&w sigma.

Had a sigma when I was in high school. Piece of **** imo.

Glock wannabe with a crappy trigger. Jammed too.

That's why s&w been redesigning and renaming it. To get rid of the bad rep.

They made the m&p to replace the sigma. No police dept was buying it.

[extracurRICular]

4006 is an old school pistol. All stainless, all metal, non striker.

Conventional all metal pistols are more expensive than plastic striker fired pistols.

Look at SIG prices or other old school handguns.

Look at the price of Smith and wesson revolvers.

Here was mine.

Was??? diggin the look of that piece doe....what you do with it?