Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who will be THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A? Obama or Romney?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostBut despite who you may be backing, you have to admit Romney is about to get steamrolled in November.Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 09-30-2012, 12:50 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostSo that's all you've got? A ridiculously skewed FOX (which you usually refer to as FAUX) poll and a baseless statement about a man who has gone to great lengths to hide his grades, SAT score and school papers, law reviews, anything that would give some indication of this boundless intelligence.
.
Obama => MAGNA cum laude
Romney => Cum laude.
Facts are your friends.. don't be mad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostAfter the DNC Mike Dukakis was ahead by 17 points over Bush's (even less competent) father. He got steamrolled. Carter was comfortably ahead at this point over Reagan. I think anyone breaking out the champagne for Barry before the 1st debate needs their head examined.
But the fact that this exceptional business executive who is the scion of a wealthy business executive and politician happens to be struggling to compete with a Kenyan Socialist is effin' hilarious.
But If Romney loses, you probably want to avoid this board on Nov 7.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostAfter the DNC Mike Dukakis was ahead by 17 points over Bush's (even less competent) father. He got steamrolled. Carter was comfortably ahead at this point over Reagan. I think anyone breaking out the champagne for Barry before the 1st debate needs their head examined.
Why is it, that the GOP always get concerned about Voter ID laws and similar pseudo concerns, prior to Presidential elections?
"By hook or Crook" comes to mind whenever I think about the GOP. They obviously do not have a platform worth mentioning, because neither Romney nor Ryan has taken even a brief moment to discuss it.
Is it a secret, is it classified ... what could possibly be the reason, for NOT laying out your detailed plan for the country, if elected??????
Did I miss that informative speech or is it yet to come?
I do not want to dismiss the possibility, that I may have just missed that speech .... so, would one of the GOP supporters, please point me to a detailed synopsis -- SERIOUSLY!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by arraamis View PostSo, what you're stating is that the GOP's still got a few more tricks up their sleeves.
1) The DNC back then was held MUCH EARLIER. So there was waaaay more time to convince voters and change minds.
The convention in 1988 was held in mid-July. We are now entering October.
2) Dukakis was an unknown entity and more prone to wild swings. As compared to Barack Obama who is an incumbent, and people know him well.
3) Polling, due to media penetration and computer models, has improved considerably than 25-30 years ago.
Comment
-
-
Mitt Romney is obviously smarter than Obama. Bilingual... speaking French. Does Obama speak any other language besides English? His private business experience. It's obvious to those of us with a trained eye that young Barack benefited from Affirmative Action a great deal... as well as Liberal preference up in Harvard. They wanted a black, exotic name to be president of the law review to calm the racial tensions at that time. He also knew that he couldn't hack it in the competitive private sector so he took his "talents" to politics from the get-go. As Jeffries said, he never released his records from Harvard. Why is that? If he had a 3.9 GPA you would think he would've released it by now.
Besides, just Obama's ideology alone confirms that he is not as smart as some think he is. He is a dumb persons idea of a genius. There is an old saying.....“If you’re not liberal when you’re 20, you have no heart. If you’re not conservative when you’re 40, you have no brain”. I'll just leave it at that.Last edited by One_Tycoon; 09-30-2012, 01:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
Sure, but my limited experience with Fox has been watching Shepard Smith sounding more like Rachel Maddow or when I'm flipping through Sirius on the radio and come across Alan Colmes. The short clips I catch of Bill O'Reilly talking about nationalizing the oil companies or Juan Williams regurgitating White House talking points. It's doubtful that I'd watch FOX even if I had a TV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View PostAfter the DNC Mike Dukakis was ahead by 17 points over Bush's (even less competent) father. He got steamrolled. Carter was comfortably ahead at this point over Reagan. I think anyone breaking out the champagne for Barry before the 1st debate needs their head examined.
Comment
Comment