What Army Head To Head Could Beat The US?

[VirusTI]

Conventionally on neutral soil: nobody, it's not even close. It's like Floyd vs Gatti.

But, it would be very, very difficult to take mainland Russia due to the SAM coverage. As it would almost be impossible to gain air superiority without nuking. And engaging Russia's troops on Russian land without air superiority would be suicidal.

China would be pretty difficult, but because most of Chinese infrastructure is located on the coast and we have Carriers(10-12 battle groups), we would be able to achieve air superiority and in turn KO China.

[MokMok]

Think about this guys.

For a so-called military force to be so "advanced" and so "ahead of everyone", the US army seem to lose a lot of wars in the last half a century or so.

If anything the best army in the world is the Israeli army. Outnumbered, encircled on all sides but remains UNDEFEATED.

[Mike Tyson77]

Think about this guys.

For a so-called military force to be so "advanced" and so "ahead of everyone", the US army seem to lose a lot of wars in the last half a century or so.

If anything the best army in the world is the Israeli army. Outnumbered, encircled on all sides but remains UNDEFEATED.

The U.S. has never lost a war, son. It's not even possible.

[D-MiZe]

Look at what a bunch of small ****s like the Vietnamese did.

US living off unfound hyp.

[MokMok]

The U.S. has never lost a war, son. It's not even possible.

It's called KOrean war?

Vietnam War?

Iraq War?

Afghan War?

I hate to break it to you but the US army have lost a lot of wars since most of your opponents have you figured out.

In boxing we call upon that age old adage. STYLES MAKES FIGHTS.

The fact is... and it is based on HISTORICAL FACT. The invincibility of the US army is more hype than fact.

Don't let some clueless guy decieve you into believing the hype.

[fight_professor]

In head to head conventional warfare, no one can touch the US army - probably for another 50-75 years. I mean set piece battles with jets and tanks et al. Too advanced.

In non-conventional war, ATM western armies arent that good as COIN operational strategy is still emerging.

[Sweet Pea 50]

Poor MokMok.....

lmaaaoooooo.

[fight_professor]

Dunno bro, US did lose strategically in Vietnam, just as it is going to leave Afghanistan 'unfixed'.

Big armies cant fight COIN wars effectively.

[F l i c k e r]

Dunno bro, US did lose strategically in Vietnam, just as it is going to leave Afghanistan 'unfixed'.

Big armies cant fight COIN wars effectively.

nam was bs. if we were given real war freedoms, they would have been raped. add the negative media, support dwindled faster than a mormon teen out of wedlock pregnancy.

ghanistan is a proxy war. it's only purpose was to gain control of and patrol the opium fields.

a real war with no bs war laws. people gettin shyt on real quick. so many head shots in the beginning of afghan that it was believed executions were being done. nope, it was just an acog on an m4.

[fight_professor]

These are 'real wars' - ask the wounded and those they left forever behind. Everyone knows the US military is powerful in conventional war, but COIN takes a different skill.