Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trayvon Martin Shooting: Voice Experts Claim Teen's Cries, Not Zimmerman's, Can Be He

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Hous View Post
    Assuming this is the same article I just read on the Huffington Post, I will leave this here:

    Very interesting. Very flawed. Very typical reporting.

    By no means is this a "home run." The first report, simply tells you its unlikely that it is GZ; it tells us nothing about it being TM. The way the article was written is very typical for this case as it rightfully expects its readers to make inferences to reach an unfounded conclusion. Surely if they would run test on GZ's voice they would also run test of TM's. That logically follows from the scientific method, no it's demanded of it. I wonder why that analysis was omitted from the presentation.

    Regarding the second report, there is nothing scientific about relying on ones tone in an agitated state to conclude that was the voice of a young man screaming. That's the first level of scientific theory, the hypothesis. A hypothesis is inherently not a scientific finding; rather it is the starting point of trials that must be taken to reach a conclusion.

    I actually do believe that it is GZ screaming. I think he TM was hitting him, however my suspicion is that he instigated it and therefore cannot claim self-defense.

    /Thread.




    what a utterly conceited and pretentious fu c kin g muggy **** that you are. You're whole involvement in this case in bscene is truly pathetic.

    Trying soooo hard to ingratiate yourself in this case just because you are in law school now you think you're johnny cochrane trying to show off your second rate ambulance chasing lawyerly skills.

    Stop trying to be some wanna be fraudulent ass omniscient moral compass of justice of bscene.

    Stop trying to portray yourself as some Infallible God of Law. You aint nothin but a b*tch ass H OE law student.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by SkillspayBills View Post
      I am calling your ilk out for it's bullshyt. You guys are like Fox News. You are totally biased which there is NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. Now Fox News calls itself "Fair and Balanced" which is a complete and utter lie. If they would admit they are an owned subsidiary of the Republican party and wish to push the Republican agenda I would have no problem with them. The fact that they act fair and balanced when it's obvious they aren't is my problem. Just like the problem I have with Hous, UglyPug, Pepe and of course, your ignorant Fox News talking point spewing ass.
      This child doesn't like it when people disagree with him. He especially doesn't like it when those that disagree with him explain why.

      If you don't like my arguments, attack them not me. If you can defeat my arguments then you may attack me. Until you do that, you lose.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by mushahadeen View Post
        If George Zimmerman ran into Elder Elemeo (or somebody that looked like him) that night instead of Trayvon Martin?




        Zimmerman probably would have invited Elder Elemeo in for coffee before giving him a ride home.

        But if you dress like a criminal sometimes people are going to make a mistake. Sorryyyyyyyyy. Just the way it goes sometimes.

        I support Trayvon's right to dress however he wanted-- but sometimes if you try to have a certain persona, people will see you that way.
        I'm black, but I don't wear my professional attire 24/7. When I'm not at work, I'm probably dressed like Trayvon with a hoodie, jeans, and some fresh J's. Is it ok to follow me and shoot me without knowing my background?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Bluetech View Post



          what a utterly conceited and pretentious fu c kin g muggy **** that you are. You're whole involvement in this case in bscene is truly pathetic.

          Trying soooo hard to ingratiate yourself in this case just because you are in law school now you think you're johnny cochrane trying to show off your second rate ambulance chasing lawyerly skills.

          Stop trying to be some wanna be fraudulent ass omniscient moral compass of justice of bscene.

          Stop trying to portray yourself as some Infallible God of Law. You aint nothin but a b*tch ass H OE law student.
          Ad hominem's are used when the person speaking it is unable to rebut the message of the person it's directed toward.

          Apparently we can't have an actual discussion on boxingscene without people getting all pissy over the Internet.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Hous View Post
            Ad hominem's are used when the person speaking it is unable to rebut the message of the person it's directed toward.

            Apparently we can't have an actual discussion on boxingscene without people getting all pissy over the Internet.


            You lie for a living.

            /thread.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Bluetech View Post
              You lie for a living.

              /thread.
              Ad hominem's are used when the person speaking it is unable to rebut the message of the person it's directed toward.

              Apparently we can't have an actual discussion on boxingscene without people getting all pissy over the Internet.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Hous View Post
                Ad hominem's are used when the person speaking it is unable to rebut the message of the person it's directed toward.

                Apparently we can't have an actual discussion on boxingscene without people getting all pissy over the Internet.

                Save it for the classroom marcia harden.

                nobody's impressed douche bag.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Bluetech View Post
                  Save it for the classroom marcia harden.

                  nobody's impressed douche bag.
                  Ad hominem's are used when the person speaking it is unable to rebut the message of the person it's directed toward.

                  Apparently we can't have an actual discussion on boxingscene without people getting all pissy over the Internet.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Personally I see it like this. We have no explanation from Martin because unfortunately hes not here to give his side. That being said you can test Zimmermans story since hes using it to hide behind self defense. If it matches Zimmermans then its all good. If not than his credibility is shot to ****. For all we know it could be a neighbor thats screaming after they saw two guys rolling around on the ground.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Paclan View Post
                      stfu man. If there was a video of Zimmerman raping a little kid in the ass you would still make excuses.

                      You would say something like maybe the kid had a life threatening tumor in his ass, and zimmerman was trying to remove it with his dick.
                      Why do you avoid facts? I don't want to hear about your gay ass fantasies.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP