Which of the arguments presented in the video do you find convincing?
All I saw was a dishonest attempt to convince uneducated people that a God exists. The people in the video know full well what they are doing - they are trying to decieve people. They know none of their arguments have any real merit, and they know their arguments have been debunked countless times, yet they still use them.
Lets take one argument at a time. Which do you want to begin with?
Which of the arguments presented in the video do you find convincing?
All I saw was a dishonest attempt to convince uneducated people that a God exists. The people in the video know full well what they are doing - they are trying to decieve people. They know none of their arguments have any real merit, and they know their arguments have been debunked countless times, yet they still use them.
Lets take one argument at a time. Which do you want to begin with?
From Part 1
Stanley Miller's experiment is completely debunked: "Watch how easy it is to debunk abiogenesis by debunking Stanley Millers experiment. See examples of how science, though evolution, witholds infomation. Correction!!! Please read. The voltage on lightning strikes range from 100,million to 1 billion volts. Not 100,000 volts. There were a lot more recent sites that supported the higher voltage, only older more outdated sites supported the lower voltage. But it makes more sense because it did not sound like 100 thousand voltage could produce temps equal to the surface of the sun. But 100 million to 1 billion sounds more feasible to do that. And all the more makes the point that any animo acids formed in the atmosphere would be also fried by the same voltage that creates it." - ikester7579
All I saw was a dishonest attempt to convince uneducated people that a God exists.
It depends on what you think god is. The truth of the matter is chances are humans will never know.
A simple question can define all logic between Atheists and Christians and make both of there arguments look completely foolish.
It's been proven time and time again that nothing can come from nothing. Everything has a creator and whether you like it or not, that's the "logic" that we as human have discovered throughout history, and it's something the atheists vastly support. A simple atom could of developed an entire universe. The thing is, who developed the atom? The atom cannot come from nothing. That defines logic, and that's what this life is. Infinite possibilities. So to say that only uneducated people believe in god is foolish, and it's even more foolish to say logic says god doesn't exist.
People can believe in what they wanna believe. We as humans have free choice. Aslong as it provides good positive energy I see no problem with it. Same with atheists. If they don't believe in god that's fine too.
However both arguments are completely and utterly stupid. Have people believe in what they wanna believe.
Everyone is their own special creator bcse in reality aside from the initial humans after that who is the real architect of lives think from what you can prove not what you imagine bcse you'll never know why harp spend your time more efficiently then this meaningless waste of energy
Comment