Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Army of widows, orphans trail US Iraq war

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Army of widows, orphans trail US Iraq war

    This is the very sad reality in Iraq: many thousands of widows and orphans.

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/185606.html

    Iraqi government sources have released shocking official figures, pointing to repercussions of the US-led military occupation of the country.

    The Arab Times website published the statistics produced in 2008 by credible official sources in Iraq on the invasion that began in 2003.

    Figures publicized by Iraq's Ministry of Women's Affairs showed that the US-led military operations had left one million widows.

    According to the report, other official estimates point to a whopping 2,500,000 Iraqi fatalities as the result of the invasion, in addition to four million children that were left orphaned by the war.

    The Iraqi Interior Ministry has also released figures pointing to 800,000 individuals that had gone missing in the country by January 2008.

    American military forces led the invasion of Iraq under the pretext that the country's former dictator Saddam Hussein was stockpiling various types of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

    However, no such weapons ever turned up in the oil-rich country. Furthermore, it was later revealed that American and British leaders, who vigorously pushed military action against Iraq while insisting on their intelligence on the existence of Iraqi WMDs, in fact knew that there were no such arms stored in the country.

    The 50,000-strong American military force that still remaining in Iraq are due to entirely withdraw out of the country by the end of 2011 in line with a bilateral agreement.

    Top US officials, however, have intensified their campaign to further extend the military presence in the oil-rich country.

    US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates visited Iraq earlier in the year to plead for an extended deployment of American forces beyond the deadline.

    Moreover, US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen has also asserted that Washington would "keep some American troops in the country” at what he claimed as 'Baghdad's request.'

    This is while a number of senior Iraqi authorities and community leaders have insisted on the total pullout of US forces by the previously agreed timeline.

  • #2
    War is never pretty. Lives lost is an unfortunate part of war but I'm not going to put much trust into an article sourcing the Arab Times, Iraqs Ministry of Women's Affair and the Iraqi Interior Ministry.

    Plus it goes on to say that "(American) leaders... knew that there were no such arms (Iraqi WMDs) stored in the country" Bullshiiit. Great face-off interview/ video with Condoleezza Rice putting it to Lawrence O'donnell on the issue: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540...24496#42924496

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Freedom.
      There were no "weapons of mass destruction" found in Iraq. The war was based on a lie.
      Yes a lie aka whatever Republicans call it now.

      Comment


      • #4
        Doesnt that trail every war?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
          Doesnt that trail every war?
          I think he pointed it out cause these wars in both countries where started blindly. The situation we're in now is comparable with Vietnam in terms of "winning".

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Freedom.
            There were no "weapons of mass destruction" found in Iraq. The war was based on a lie.
            A lie. How original. You're not one of those "progressives" that believes everything the left wing media spews out and simply repeats it ad nauseum are you? Don't tell me you also believe in global warming? Curious to know if you think there is a Muslim problem in the world and whether it is vital for the US to stand with Israel.

            I never liked the way things were handled but watch the video i posted. Even if you don't believe in the WMD cause, Condi makes a stronger point for us being there than us now being in Lybia. But how surprising that the left wing media (which is not biased at all of course ) somehow gives the current President-in-chief a big fat pass. Michael Moore said the other day, that compared to Bush, it's ok for the current prez to go into the Lybia "non-war" because his hearts in the right place

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Russian Crushin View Post
              Doesnt that trail every war?
              Yes, which is why it never should've happened.

              2+ million iraqi fatalities
              thousand upon thousand of dead soldiers
              country in anarchy
              millions of orphan children

              what for? An illegal war build on deceit, lies and bull****.

              Comment


              • #8
                It's interesting to me that these politicians, just because they didn't pull the actual triggers in person, are able to sleep at night with so many deaths and ruined lives resulting from their casual, off-hand decisions.

                Comment


                • #9
                  i was always against invading iraq.

                  several dozen nukes would have done the job.


                  oh wait..... gotta keep the oil fields.

                  chemical weapons then.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by D.I.E.S.E.L View Post
                    I think he pointed it out cause these wars in both countries where started blindly. The situation we're in now is comparable with Vietnam in terms of "winning".
                    what is actually "winning" in a war anyway?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP