Originally posted by miron_lang
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are you a LOGICAL Person, Come take this TEST and find out!!!
Collapse
-
-
My original call is 1, but upon further review, the answer was changed. 2 is the correct answer.
Loss of down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Blobby View PostThere's 2 answers. Uncle and Father.Originally posted by Mr. Blobby View PostThere is 2 correct answers, i've seen a riddle similar to this before but you've written it wrong. You said the man lying on the floor is a only child instead of the carpenter. If the Carpenter was an only child it would be his father, but because you said the man on the floor is an only child it can be uncle or father.
and i think you're right
the man walking should be the only son of the carpenter to be able to have just one answer.
I'll consider that as correct answer lol. i'll send the 100M now
Comment
-
Originally posted by miron_lang View PostThanks so much for analyzing. i reviewed the question just now
and i think you're right
the man walking should be the only son of the carpenter to be able to have just one answer.
I'll consider that as correct answer lol. i'll send the 100M now
Comment
-
Originally posted by Horus View Postyou do know that every LSAT exam is not the same right?
Also, one of the first things anyone learns about the LSAT is there are no tricks questions. 1+1 always equals 2, if it doesn't its wrong therefore it would NEVER appear on the LSAT.
The LSAT has different questions of varying difficulty 4 times a year but since its been issued, its always been the way I said.
Comment
-
The calculator and basic common sense tells me 1+0=1. Therefore, the correct answer is in fact 1. Hows that for logical?
Comment
-
It's funny how some loser probably jobless read this logic question on the back of some cracker jack box and is now trying to pass it off on boxingscene like he's an Ivy league professor. It probably took 2 weeks for his 8 year old brother to explain it to him.lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Davis40 View PostIt's funny how some loser probably jobless read this logic question on the back of some cracker jack box and is now trying to pass it off on boxingscene like he's an Ivy league professor. It probably took 2 weeks for his 8 year old brother to explain it to him.lol
lol I'm not sure the theoretical man even deserved that.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
Comment
Comment