Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Irish not scared, Irish Vessel Rachel Corrie on route to Gaza despite threats

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by The Impaler View Post
    What about the London Subway bombings? Was that the US as well?
    Erm they have nothig to do with Gaza BTW.

    Originally posted by GJC View Post
    I could do with a laugh in these sad times, how did they do it again?
    Again, Bin Laden is not in Gaza or from Gaza.

    That's like saying USA should be bobmed because Mexico started beef with Japan or some ****.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by GJC View Post
      Oh and don't just put up that Loose Change video, you know that Avery was about 18 when he made it right? Not denigrating 18 year olds but what qualifications does he have? If you rely on a MTV video by a teenager as your proof who's being the lazy one here?
      a building just can't collapse like that.

      i'm sure every engineer takes into considerations 100's of 1000's of gallons of burning jet fuel.

      it was a conspiracy i tell you.

      it was done by the american government in cooperation with israel and planned out by elvis and tupac.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
        can we keep a few of them?

        like to make humus and pitas and stuff?

        middle eastern food is good.
        Humus and pITA IS TOO HEALTHY BRO.

        Ever had a doner kebab? that **** is nice

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by .PrettyBoy32. View Post
          Do you know the FBI visited a hotel near the Pentagon to confiscate film from a security camera which some hotel employees had been watching in horror shortly after the attack.
          They also visited the Citgo gas station southwest of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack to confiscate film that may have captured the attack. According to Jose Velasquez, who was working at the gas station at the time of the attack, the station's security cameras would have captured the attack....
          going to ignore the eye witness tentimoney of Penny Elgas, Ann Owens, James Ryan, Albert Hemphill, Steve Riskus and Donald Timmerman and believe an urban myth then? Going to mention the hole?

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            a building just can't collapse like that.

            i'm sure every engineer takes into considerations 100's of 1000's of gallons of burning jet fuel.

            it was a conspiracy i tell you.

            it was done by the american government in cooperation with israel and planned out by elvis and tupac.
            Your quite right lol. Good job the guys who smuggled in the explosives over months for the controlled explosion managed to use particularily inert explosives that wouldn't be set off by that airoplane fuel

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by GJC View Post
              Your quite right lol. Good job the guys who smuggled in the explosives over months for the controlled explosion managed to use particularily inert explosives that wouldn't be set off by that airoplane fuel
              i'm sure it ain't that hard to clandestinely plant demolition explosives in 2 110-story buildings.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                i'm sure it ain't that hard to clandestinely plant demolition explosives in 2 110-story buildings.
                not a problem at all just move the photocopier tuck a few under the secretary's swival chair for a controlled explosion how many floors are we talking about?

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by GJC View Post
                  going to ignore the eye witness tentimoney of Penny Elgas, Ann Owens, James Ryan, Albert Hemphill, Steve Riskus and Donald Timmerman and believe an urban myth then? Going to mention the hole?
                  Urban myth?

                  At least two plaintiffs have attempted to obtain videos seized by the FBI, using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The first, documented at Flight77.info, began with a request to the FBI in October of 2004. The second, undertaken by the Judicial Watch, Inc. began with a request to the Department of Defense (DOD) in December of 2004. Following is a timeline of the requests and subsequent lawsuits. Entries relating to the second case are distinguished with dates colored gray.

                  * October 14, 2004: Scott A. Hodes, on behalf of his client Scott Bingham, sends a request to David Hardy of the FBI requesting any videos "that may have captured the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001". The request letter mentions videotapes from the Citgo Gas Station and the Sheraton National Hotel.
                  * November 3, 2004: The FBI replies to Bingham's request stating that their search "revealed no record responsive to your FOIA request".
                  * November 17, 2004: Hodes files an appeal of Bingham's FOIA request with the U.S Department of Justice (DOJ), citing evidence that the videotapes mentioned in the original request exist.
                  * December 15, 2004: Christopher J. Farrell of Judicial Watch, Inc. writes to James Hogan in the Office of Freedom of Information/Security Review of the DOD requesting that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), DOD, and FBI produce:
                  any and all agency records concerning, relating to, or reflecting the following subjects:

                  (1) Video camera recordings obtained by federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from a Nexcomm/Citgo gas station in the vicinity of the Pentagon on or about September 11, 2001.

                  (2) Pentagon security video camera recording(s) showing Flight 77 strike and/or hit and/or crash into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

                  (3) Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) video camera recording(s) obtained by any federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") and/or the VDOT "Smart Traffic Center" on or about September 11, 2001.
                  * March 7, 2005: The DOJ replies to Hodes' November 17 appeal, admitting that it did possess records responsive to the request but that it could release the records because such a release "could reasonably be expected to interfere with law enforcement proceedings."
                  * January 26, 2005: The DOD advises Judicial Watch, Inc. that it possesses a videotape responsive to the December 15, 2004 request but declines to produce the videotape, citing U.S.C 552(b)(7)(A).
                  * March 8, 2005: Bingham's attorney files a lawsuit with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia stating that the FBI is in violation of the FOIA for "failing to adequately respond to plaintiff's FOIA request, including failing to adequately search for and release records that the plaintiff believes the agency is in possession of, and for failing to timely respond to the plaintiff's administrative appeal."
                  * April 18, 2005: The DOJ files a response to Bingham's March 8 lawsuit denying the plaintiff's request and asking the judge to dismiss the plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice.
                  * April 19, 2005: District Judge Paul L. Friedman orders the defendants to file a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment in the case brought by Bingham on or before June 21, 2005.
                  * June 10, 2005: The DOD denies Judicial Watch's administrative appeal, claiming that the video is exempt as part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui.
                  * August 1, 2005: Jeffrey D. Kahn, an attorney for the DOJ's Civil Division files a 23-page MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Scans of the document are posted on Flight77.info.
                  * August 29, 2005: Hodes files a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and a STATEMENT OF FACT ON WHICH THERE EXIST A GENUINE ISSUE TO BE LITIGATED in response to the DOJ's motion for summary judgment.
                  * September 9, 2005: Kahn files a REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
                  * September 9, 2005: Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division files a DECLARATION describing her search for records responsive to Bingham's FOIA request. Maguire admits to determining that 85 videotapes in the FBI's possession are "potentially responsive" the request, that she personally viewed 29 of the tapes, and that she located only one videotape that showed the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Maguire also refers to "one videotape taken from a closed circuit television at a Doubletree Hotel in Arlington Virginia," but states that it did not show the impact of Flight 77.
                  * September 26, 2005: Hodes files a request seeking "copies of 85 videotapes in the possession of the FBI described in the declaration of Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire dated September 7, 2005.
                  * October 20, 2005: The DOJ sends a letter to Hodes claiming that the requested material is exempt.
                  * October 24, 2005: Hodes appeals the DOJ's October 20 claim that its material is exempt.
                  * February 22, 2006: Judicial Watch, Inc. files a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Department of Defense for its refusal to disclose records sought under the FOIA request.
                  * May 5, 2006: Judge Friedman orders the defendants to show cause on or before May 26, 2006 why their motion for summary judgment should not be denied as moot, noting that the criminal proceedings against Moussaoui have ended.
                  * May 16, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains two videos from the DOD, and posts them on their website. The site is down for about half of the day due to demand.
                  * September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. 3 The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.
                  * December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon's facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner. 4

                  Come back to me Facts, Because your opinion doesn't mean **** to me mate

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by GJC View Post
                    not a problem at all just move the photocopier tuck a few under the secretary's swival chair for a controlled explosion how many floors are we talking about?
                    220 total for the 2 towers.



                    did they plant demolition bombs in the pentagon too?



                    what about the plane that crashed? what building was it headed to? what happened to the bombs they planted in that building?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by .PrettyBoy32. View Post
                      Urban myth?

                      At least two plaintiffs have attempted to obtain videos seized by the FBI, using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The first, documented at Flight77.info, began with a request to the FBI in October of 2004. The second, undertaken by the Judicial Watch, Inc. began with a request to the Department of Defense (DOD) in December of 2004. Following is a timeline of the requests and subsequent lawsuits. Entries relating to the second case are distinguished with dates colored gray.

                      * October 14, 2004: Scott A. Hodes, on behalf of his client Scott Bingham, sends a request to David Hardy of the FBI requesting any videos "that may have captured the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001". The request letter mentions videotapes from the Citgo Gas Station and the Sheraton National Hotel.
                      * November 3, 2004: The FBI replies to Bingham's request stating that their search "revealed no record responsive to your FOIA request".
                      * November 17, 2004: Hodes files an appeal of Bingham's FOIA request with the U.S Department of Justice (DOJ), citing evidence that the videotapes mentioned in the original request exist.
                      * December 15, 2004: Christopher J. Farrell of Judicial Watch, Inc. writes to James Hogan in the Office of Freedom of Information/Security Review of the DOD requesting that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), DOD, and FBI produce:
                      any and all agency records concerning, relating to, or reflecting the following subjects:

                      (1) Video camera recordings obtained by federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from a Nexcomm/Citgo gas station in the vicinity of the Pentagon on or about September 11, 2001.

                      (2) Pentagon security video camera recording(s) showing Flight 77 strike and/or hit and/or crash into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

                      (3) Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) video camera recording(s) obtained by any federal official(s) and/or law enforcement from the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") and/or the VDOT "Smart Traffic Center" on or about September 11, 2001.
                      * March 7, 2005: The DOJ replies to Hodes' November 17 appeal, admitting that it did possess records responsive to the request but that it could release the records because such a release "could reasonably be expected to interfere with law enforcement proceedings."
                      * January 26, 2005: The DOD advises Judicial Watch, Inc. that it possesses a videotape responsive to the December 15, 2004 request but declines to produce the videotape, citing U.S.C 552(b)(7)(A).
                      * March 8, 2005: Bingham's attorney files a lawsuit with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia stating that the FBI is in violation of the FOIA for "failing to adequately respond to plaintiff's FOIA request, including failing to adequately search for and release records that the plaintiff believes the agency is in possession of, and for failing to timely respond to the plaintiff's administrative appeal."
                      * April 18, 2005: The DOJ files a response to Bingham's March 8 lawsuit denying the plaintiff's request and asking the judge to dismiss the plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice.
                      * April 19, 2005: District Judge Paul L. Friedman orders the defendants to file a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment in the case brought by Bingham on or before June 21, 2005.
                      * June 10, 2005: The DOD denies Judicial Watch's administrative appeal, claiming that the video is exempt as part of an ongoing investigation involving Zacarias Moussaoui.
                      * August 1, 2005: Jeffrey D. Kahn, an attorney for the DOJ's Civil Division files a 23-page MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Scans of the document are posted on Flight77.info.
                      * August 29, 2005: Hodes files a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and a STATEMENT OF FACT ON WHICH THERE EXIST A GENUINE ISSUE TO BE LITIGATED in response to the DOJ's motion for summary judgment.
                      * September 9, 2005: Kahn files a REPLY BRIEF IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
                      * September 9, 2005: Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division files a DECLARATION describing her search for records responsive to Bingham's FOIA request. Maguire admits to determining that 85 videotapes in the FBI's possession are "potentially responsive" the request, that she personally viewed 29 of the tapes, and that she located only one videotape that showed the impact of Flight 77 into the Pentagon. Maguire also refers to "one videotape taken from a closed circuit television at a Doubletree Hotel in Arlington Virginia," but states that it did not show the impact of Flight 77.
                      * September 26, 2005: Hodes files a request seeking "copies of 85 videotapes in the possession of the FBI described in the declaration of Special Agent Jacqueline Maguire dated September 7, 2005.
                      * October 20, 2005: The DOJ sends a letter to Hodes claiming that the requested material is exempt.
                      * October 24, 2005: Hodes appeals the DOJ's October 20 claim that its material is exempt.
                      * February 22, 2006: Judicial Watch, Inc. files a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Department of Defense for its refusal to disclose records sought under the FOIA request.
                      * May 5, 2006: Judge Friedman orders the defendants to show cause on or before May 26, 2006 why their motion for summary judgment should not be denied as moot, noting that the criminal proceedings against Moussaoui have ended.
                      * May 16, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains two videos from the DOD, and posts them on their website. The site is down for about half of the day due to demand.
                      * September 15, 2006: Judicial Watch announces the release of video from CITGO gas station. 3 The video consists mostly of views of the interior of the gas station and does not appear to capture the attack.
                      * December 2, 2006: Judicial Watch obtains a video recording from the Doubletree Hotel in Arlington. The video, which does not include a view of the Pentagon's facade, shows an explosion but does not capture an approaching jetliner. 4

                      Come back to me Facts, Because your opinion doesn't mean **** to me mate
                      So a bunch of professional conspiracy theorists are getting the run around from the authorities, you'd get the same from the utility companies. Don't you want to make the point that the hole in the pentagon didn't form an exact sillouette of a plane like what happens in the Tom and Jerry cartoons when Tom runs through a wall?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP