Obama, One speach, One apology

[Dr.Depravity]

Obama had to apologize to Nancy Reagan today because of a remark he made about not consulting her for a seance. Turns out he was criticizing the wrong first lady. It was Hillary Clinton who had a seance with friends at the White House and supposedly talked to Elanor Roosevelt.

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=80438

[Jim Jeffries]

Obama had to apologize to Nancy Reagan today because of a remark he made about not consulting her for a seance. Turns out he was criticizing the wrong first lady. It was Hillary Clinton who had a seance with friends at the White House and supposedly talked to Elanor Roosevelt.

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=80438

Wrongly insulting the widow of one of our greatest presidents. Classy.

[BmoreBrawler]

Lol.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard60.html

[Jim Jeffries]

Lol.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard60.html

Sounds like the ramblings of one of my communist friends (small town, what can I say.) They all blame and hate Reagan for helping defeat communism.

[BmoreBrawler]

Sounds like the ramblings of one of my communist friends (small town, what can I say.) They all blame and hate Reagan for helping defeat communism.

You have to actually read it.

[Jim Jeffries]

You have to actually read it.

I read enough. My mind would turn to mush if I read crap like that all day.

[BmoreBrawler]

I read enough. My mind would turn to mush if I read crap like that all day.

Reading things written by Phd's in Economics will do that.

[Jim Jeffries]

Reading things written by Phd's in Economics will do that.

What I read was some of the most biased garbage I've ever read in my life. When two Phd's disagree completely on an issue, are they still both right? If a Phd takes a crap, I'm pretty sure it still tastes like sht.

Maybe if the guy toned it down a little, he might actually get what might be some viable points across to a greater audience.

[BmoreBrawler]

What I read was some of the most biased garbage I've ever read in my life. When two Phd's disagree completely on an issue, are they still both right? If a Phd takes a crap, I'm pretty sure it still tastes like sht.

Maybe if the guy toned it down a little, he might actually get what might be some viable points across to a greater audience.

Yes, lets dumb everything down so that we can sound like Faux News and MSNBC. Democrat/Republican. Blue/Red. Black/White. Reagan/Clinton. Bush good, Kerry bad.

You don't have to agree with all of it, but its an entertaining look at the Reagan presidency from a third perspective outside the establishment mainstream.

http://www.mises.org/article.aspx?Id=1544

Here's one that uses less "hurtful" language.

[Dr.Depravity]

I only read about two paragraphs, One sentence was a slam, then next a backhanded compliment, then a slam, followed by a compliment, then a slam. It got incredibly boring.
I don't care about his memory, or lack there of. He knew government was not the answer to a lot of problems, he also knew that if you give people more of their own hard earned money, the economy grows. Not to mention destroying Communist Russia without firing a shot.