Tweet
Okay so my brother has his PS3 80GB in his girlfriends house for now because my sister needs the bedroom for her and her daughter until she moves out with her boyfriend. So my bro plays the PS3 in his girls house now.
So i'm thinking of buying one for myself.
I was googling for pros and cons for both PS3 slim and the 60GB one and all I found was threads cocksucking the PS3 Slim.
Let me be honest, I hate how the PS3 slim looks. It's so ugly and looks cheap, and it is cheap. For a 320GB it cost $400 at Best Buy. That's cheap as hell for so much GB's.
Then the PS3 60GB cost $800, and a refurbished one cost $450. Looks better, doesn't look cheap, isn't cheap, and it just looks better than the slim by 100x, it looks modern. I like how it's shiny. The slim doesn't have that shiny plastic and the design looks like it should be for a system for a 1990s system.
I know the PS3 60GB is more likely to get the YLOD if you don't take care of it. My neighbor has had his PS3 60GB since it came out(the $600+tax one) and he told me all that stuff about the 60GB getting damaged is bull****. He said that happens to people that leave there PS3 on 24/7 even when they're not at home and they never even clean up the dust. And I understand that because it's the same as a computer where you have to clean it after a while. You have to open it up and dust it off. I take his word for it because he's had his for a couple of years now with no problems at all.
To top it off, the PS3 slim is not Backward Compatible like the 60GB. The slim just sucks in so many ways.
But I want to read some opinions. Maybe I can change my mind and settle for the pathetic-looking PS3 slim if someone can persuade me that it's a lot better than the 60GB one.
Please help, don't just read this. If you have any advice, post it. I'm opened to changing my mind.
So i'm thinking of buying one for myself.
I was googling for pros and cons for both PS3 slim and the 60GB one and all I found was threads cocksucking the PS3 Slim.
Let me be honest, I hate how the PS3 slim looks. It's so ugly and looks cheap, and it is cheap. For a 320GB it cost $400 at Best Buy. That's cheap as hell for so much GB's.
Then the PS3 60GB cost $800, and a refurbished one cost $450. Looks better, doesn't look cheap, isn't cheap, and it just looks better than the slim by 100x, it looks modern. I like how it's shiny. The slim doesn't have that shiny plastic and the design looks like it should be for a system for a 1990s system.
I know the PS3 60GB is more likely to get the YLOD if you don't take care of it. My neighbor has had his PS3 60GB since it came out(the $600+tax one) and he told me all that stuff about the 60GB getting damaged is bull****. He said that happens to people that leave there PS3 on 24/7 even when they're not at home and they never even clean up the dust. And I understand that because it's the same as a computer where you have to clean it after a while. You have to open it up and dust it off. I take his word for it because he's had his for a couple of years now with no problems at all.
To top it off, the PS3 slim is not Backward Compatible like the 60GB. The slim just sucks in so many ways.
But I want to read some opinions. Maybe I can change my mind and settle for the pathetic-looking PS3 slim if someone can persuade me that it's a lot better than the 60GB one.
Please help, don't just read this. If you have any advice, post it. I'm opened to changing my mind.
Comment