Hagler,Hearns,Leonard,Duran - Who did u like best

[Shanus]

I don't know about that, RJJ was a monster @ 160. Hearns would be fighting a big man with more speed, power, and better reflexes.

He had the physical advantage, Roy wasn't that much bigger, if at all.

Hearns was a genetic freak at 147, and at 160 he was still pretty big.

[The Scientist]

I liked Hagler's no bull**** approach in the ring, genuine tough guy that showed up and kicked your ass. I also enjoyed watching Leonard, just like the Sugar before him, he was given a little bit of everything from the Boxing gods. Hagler was unusualy strong for the lanky frame that he had, and the combinations he put together was like watching a finely coordinated symphony, it was breathtaking. Duran, what can I say about Duran? He fought for close to five decades, started boxing since the age of 16, and when he was in the ring, it was like watching a muging taking place. Duran was a warrior in the purest sence. Damnit, sorry but I cannot choose, as I favor everyone of these fighter's for different reasons.