I'm in a similar situation as you. One of my favorite fighters is Antonio Margarito. I love his style of forward action and vicious punching. I know his faults, he's easy to hit and his handspeed isn't impressive, but I really give him a good shot at beating Mayweather because I will he will utilize his strength and size to pressure the smaller but superior Mayweather and knock him out. When I mention this on the forum, I encounter criticism.
Likewise you Briggs fans see him beating Wladimir Klitschko while I laugh at the idea. I just don't see it happening.
I'm not trying to compare Wlad to Mayweather but there are similarities here. We both back a guy the majority of fans don't see having a chance, but in our minds we can visualize the upset so clearly and wonder why no one else can see it.
Here's the difference. I do think Margarito has a much better chance of pulling off his upset than Briggs. He has size on his side in addition to his stylistic advantages and I think lacking handspeed is a more forgiveable weakness than having no stamina. Briggs really just strikes me as an incomplete fighter whereas Margarito is a flawed masterpiece who will always find a way to win at welterweight.
The point though is, putting yourself in someone else's shoes and trying to figure out how they can see a fight going a certain way that differs from yours. Having respect for their opinion. If you have any objectivity you can look at yourself and say "you know, I favor so and so against this fighter when no one else does so maybe this other guy isn't so crazy in his pick here".
Likewise you Briggs fans see him beating Wladimir Klitschko while I laugh at the idea. I just don't see it happening.
I'm not trying to compare Wlad to Mayweather but there are similarities here. We both back a guy the majority of fans don't see having a chance, but in our minds we can visualize the upset so clearly and wonder why no one else can see it.
Here's the difference. I do think Margarito has a much better chance of pulling off his upset than Briggs. He has size on his side in addition to his stylistic advantages and I think lacking handspeed is a more forgiveable weakness than having no stamina. Briggs really just strikes me as an incomplete fighter whereas Margarito is a flawed masterpiece who will always find a way to win at welterweight.
The point though is, putting yourself in someone else's shoes and trying to figure out how they can see a fight going a certain way that differs from yours. Having respect for their opinion. If you have any objectivity you can look at yourself and say "you know, I favor so and so against this fighter when no one else does so maybe this other guy isn't so crazy in his pick here".
Comment