Klitschko v Brock whats your take on it...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RockyMarcianofan00
    The Rock of His Times
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 3250
    • 152
    • 146
    • 11,322

    #1

    Klitschko v Brock whats your take on it...

    I'm not a normal in Non Stop Boxing but what the heck...

    Tomorrow [Nov 11th 2006] (my birthday) is the fight and I was wondering what your take on it is....

    lets see the

    Tale of the Tape

    Wladmir Klitschko

    Height:6'6
    Weight:TBA
    Style:Orthodox
    Reach:81'
    Age (at the time of fight):30

    Record (before fight)-
    46-3-0
    41 KO's

    Calvin Brock
    Height:6'2
    Weight:TBA
    Style:Orthodox
    Reach:77'
    Age (at the time of fight):31

    Record (before fight)-
    29-0-0
    22 KO's

    Brock gives up 4' in height, 4' in reach, and one year in age....Also Wlad has had 20 more fights then Brock which gives him the edge in experience, I'd also venture to say Wlad has fought more noteworthy contenders then Brock..

    whats your take on the fight...
    19
    Klitschko by KO
    31.58%
    6
    Klitschko by TKO
    57.89%
    11
    Klitschko by Decision
    5.26%
    1
    Brock by KO
    0.00%
    0
    Brock by TKO
    5.26%
    1
    Brock by Decision
    0.00%
    0
    Undecided
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.

  • BloodClot
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 806
    • 48
    • 0
    • 903

    #2
    Chalk one up for da wite folks saturday night

    Comment

    • RockyMarcianofan00
      The Rock of His Times
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 3250
      • 152
      • 146
      • 11,322

      #3
      Now that the thread is made I notice that there's already a thread for this....and I looked before I made this...o well mine has a tale of the tape

      Comment

      • Kid Achilles
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2004
        • 6376
        • 467
        • 354
        • 14,544

        #4
        I'd also venture to say Wlad has fought more noteworthy contenders then Brock..
        I wouldn't call that a venture, it's a fact. Wlad has one of the best resumes of the heavyweights, both for who he's beaten and how he's done it: usually my knockout.

        What do I think about the fight? I think too much time has been spent discussing it already. It's gonna be a cakewalk for Wlad.

        Comment

        • RockyMarcianofan00
          The Rock of His Times
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 3250
          • 152
          • 146
          • 11,322

          #5
          Originally posted by Kid Achilles
          I wouldn't call that a venture, it's a fact. Wlad has one of the best resumes of the heavyweights, both for who he's beaten and how he's done it: usually my knockout.

          What do I think about the fight? I think too much time has been spent discussing it already. It's gonna be a cakewalk for Wlad.
          well in comparison to Brock's resume Wlad's is even better...

          Comment

          • Kid Achilles
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2004
            • 6376
            • 467
            • 354
            • 14,544

            #6
            Compared to anyone but John Ruiz, Wlad's record is clearly better. I agree with you that he has the better resume, but you can be a little more confident in saying it. "I venture" suggests that it's close when it isn't. Wlad is one of the most tested heavyweights out there and has the best record at heavyweight of anyone who's currently active (other than someone like Holyfield who should just retire anyway as he isn't relevent to the top heavyweight picture anymore) whereas Brock only has Timur Ibragimov and McCline.

            Comment

            • RockyMarcianofan00
              The Rock of His Times
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 3250
              • 152
              • 146
              • 11,322

              #7
              Originally posted by Kid Achilles
              Compared to anyone but John Ruiz, Wlad's record is clearly better. I agree with you that he has the better resume, but you can be a little more confident in saying it. "I venture" suggests that it's close when it isn't. Wlad is one of the most tested heavyweights out there and has the best record at heavyweight of anyone who's currently active (other than someone like Holyfield who should just retire anyway as he isn't relevent to the top heavyweight picture anymore) whereas Brock only has Timur Ibragimov and McCline.
              Very true...all of it

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP