To Many Heavyweight Titles!!!

[Pyro™]

There are way to many titles, there are like 6 or 7 titles. It was set up nicely in the 70's. There were 3 titles the WBA, the WBC, and the WBO. It was a simple fight routine for the champions. 2 champions fight to unify there belts. The winner would fight the other champion for the unification of all the belts, thats not complicated at all! Now if your champion don't be overly prowd of yourself, its not saying much. Your one of 6 or 7 people to be heavyweight champion, big whup. They should get rid of 3 or 4 different titles. If your ranked number 10 of the world your not really in 10th there are 16 people ahead of you really you are 16th of the world when your in first you are in 7th and so on. Thats my point on why there are to many titles.

[IwatchBoxing]

too many divsions, having 4 champions doesnt matter as long as you dont multiply that by 1 for every main one there is. Cruiserweight is Heaveyweights cut leg's..

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

because all of the sanctioning bodies want to make money.

[Welter_Skelter]

There are way to many titles, there are like 6 or 7 titles. It was set up nicely in the 70's. There were 3 titles the WBA, the WBC, and the WBO. It was a simple fight routine for the champions. 2 champions fight to unify there belts. The winner would fight the other champion for the unification of all the belts, thats not complicated at all! Now if your champion don't be overly prowd of yourself, its not saying much. Your one of 6 or 7 people to be heavyweight champion, big whup. They should get rid of 3 or 4 different titles. If your ranked number 10 of the world your not really in 10th there are 16 people ahead of you really you are 16th of the world when your in first you are in 7th and so on. Thats my point on why there are to many titles.

2 WORDS... Sanction FEES!!!

[scap]

Ill tell you what anytime you got Poppa Pump and IWATCH back to back on a thread you know you have some solid ****ing solutions to tough ass questions.

Like always great work men.

[Guest]

Ill tell you what anytime you got Poppa Pump and IWATCH back to back on a thread you know you have some solid ****ing solutions to tough ass questions.

Like always great work men.

LOL, cheeky ****er.

[badblood]

because all of the sanctioning bodies want to make money.

I thought the sanctioning bodies were "non profit."

[BrooklynBomber]

I thinks its too many instead of to many.
cause it looks like you are addressing this to the sanctioning bodies.

[T.N.T]

i just wish there were 3 titles that way they would maintain more value as the richest prize in sports.

[Southpaw Stinger]

There are way to many titles, there are like 6 or 7 titles. It was set up nicely in the 70's. There were 3 titles the WBA, the WBC, and the WBO. It was a simple fight routine for the champions. 2 champions fight to unify there belts. The winner would fight the other champion for the unification of all the belts, thats not complicated at all! Now if your champion don't be overly prowd of yourself, its not saying much. Your one of 6 or 7 people to be heavyweight champion, big whup. They should get rid of 3 or 4 different titles. If your ranked number 10 of the world your not really in 10th there are 16 people ahead of you really you are 16th of the world when your in first you are in 7th and so on. Thats my point on why there are to many titles.

In the 70's there was only the WBA and WBC. In the early 80's the IBF came, in the late 80's came the WBO and in the 90's came lots of other ****ty titles.

i just wish there were 3 titles that way they would maintain more value as the richest prize in sports.

I wish there was only one world champ per division. It's seem sill to think that we can have 4 guys who all claim to be the world champ at the same time in only one division!