Oscar dela Hoe?Yeah! is PATHETIC!

[Sin City]

well I knew Pac was gonna MOrales' ass but many people still bought it.


Seriously thogh, GB hasn't impressed me with his promotion. The fact that he hides Barrera under his skirt ofr the past 3 yrs against Manny is ghey.

I knew that was gonna be a kill too. If Manny vs Barrera is what you want then you will get it soon, Pacs already training for that **** from what I read. I give that fight to Pac he's untop of his game, his skill level has improved ALOT and is in his prime. I think Barrera still has a fight left in him but I don't know if he will be able to win. I doubt it. If he does pull it off it will be by split decision. I say out with the old and in with the new...Pac-Guzman, or Pac-Marquez would be more interesting and would be better. I wanna see Marquez fight him so people can shut the **** up about the draw..witch ever way it goes, Plus the first fight was ill. I wanna see Guzman because I know hes gonna be a challenge.

[Manny_P]

OK, here is a news flash: Boxers are not charity workers!!!!

De La Hoya is going to try to maximise his profits, big surprise. It is his job and he is trying to make the most money possible. Similar to, let me see, every other boxer in the history of the sport. In fact just about every other athlete in all of sports. Your hating on him for being good at making money. Every other boxer wants money just like De La Hoya does, Oscar just gets more of it. You have something against him for being a good businessman and a popular exciting fighter, when there is nothing wrong with it.

how can de la hoya possibly have made money from Barrera vs Fana?

[OctoberRed]

I usually stick up for some of the Filipinos here, but there thread started is a moron and one of the reasons that many Filipinos users are bashed on the site. This was nothing but a thread started to incite hatred, just read the intelligent title of the thread.

[Manny_P]

I usually stick up for some of the Filipinos here, but there thread started is a moron and one of the reasons that many Filipinos users are bashed on the site. This was nothing but a thread started to incite hatred, just read the intelligent title of the thread.

thread title is as steezy and creative as I can get. Appreciate, don't hate.

[HendrixLove]

he held belts, but Pacquiao was the peoples champion and the draw. You know Marquez can't put people in seats even if you glue their asses.

he asked for 1.4 mil when Pac was gonna get paid 900,00 (and it some of those money coming from promoter personally). Marquez didn't beat Pac to ask 1.5 mil.Tito beat de la hoya (eventhough it was sketchy)

Dude are you ******ed? You just said Pacquiao should have got the bigger purse because he somehow was the draw, and yet your saying the biggest draw in boxing (Oscar) should get the lower purse......???????? You back it up by saying Tito has a win over him even though it's "sketchy," yet you say Pac should get a higher purse biggest he really won the fight,but you don't mention that the fight was a draw and could be sketchy like you feel about the Oscar/Tito fight to defend Tito's case...............go to bed son.

[Manny_P]

Dude are you ******ed? You just said Pacquiao should have got the bigger purse because he somehow was the draw, and yet your saying the biggest draw in boxing (Oscar) should get the lower purse......???????? You back it up by saying Tito has a win over him even though it's "sketchy," yet you say Pac should get a higher purse biggest he really won the fight,but you don't mention that the fight was a draw and could be sketchy like you feel about the Oscar/Tito fight to defend Tito's case...............go to bed son.

where did I say that Oscar should get the less money? I didnt. I said 70-30 is outrageous and I explained it in details.

I said Pac should get higher money than Marquez because HE'S THE DRAW and was the peoples champion. Doesn't have to do with the oputcome. Man, you dont read what I type.

[HendrixLove]

where did I say that Oscar should get the less money? I didnt. I said 70-30 is outrageous and I explained it in details.

I said Pac should get higher money than Marquez because HE'S THE DRAW and was the peoples champion. Doesn't have to do with the oputcome. Man, you dont read what I type.

Oh ok I get you, your going by a different story. The thing is, on the spanish papers, it said it was Tito that asked for the 70-30 spilt. So I need some proof that said Oscar wanted such a high purse, and if it's true than damn your right.

[HendrixLove]

Also I'm pretty sure it was Tito that was asking for that purse because Tito said thats what it was gonna take him to get out of retirement to fight him, so I'm sure I'm right and you just got it wrong.

[Manny_P]

Oh ok I get you, your going by a different story. The thing is, on the spanish papers, it said it was Tito that asked for the 70-30 spilt. So I need some proof that said Oscar wanted such a high purse, and if it's true than damn your right.

dude, i wouldnt make a silly thread like this if I hadn't read valid articles. Oscar did say he wants 70-30. If Tito asked then HES NUTS cuz he lost by sweepage to Winky while de la hoya look impressive as if "he was back" against Mayorga.

I also remember it clearly that article writers say that even if it would be 70-30 spilt for de lahoy having bigger pay, IT WOULD STILL be Tito's carreer payment high, yeah so that's that.

[HendrixLove]

dude, i wouldnt make a silly thread like this if I hadn't read valid articles. Oscar did say he wants 70-30. If Tito asked then HES NUTS cuz he lost by sweepage to Winky while de la hoya look impressive as if "he was back" against Mayorga.

I also remember it clearly that article writers say that even if it would be 70-30 spilt for de lahoy having bigger pay, IT WOULD STILL be Tito's carreer payment high, yeah so that's that.

I'll need to look it up because I remember reading and hearing that Tito was demanding a high purse to get him out of retirement.