Your JMM-Pacquiao scorecard

**DiegoFuego** · 09-30-2006, 10:13 AM

I had it widely in favor of Pacquiao 8 rounds to 4, which makes it 116-109

**DiegoFuego** · 09-30-2006, 10:13 AM

I don't care what anyone tries to say, Pacquiao won rounds 7-10 BIG with that straight left hand. He was knocking JMM's head every way but off.

**PRboxingfan** · 09-30-2006, 10:21 AM

I had JMM winning rounds 3-12. I thought Pac only won the first two. I haven't seen it again since I saw it the first time live, but that's how I remember scoring it.

Maybe I should see it again, but I thought JMM was counterpunching beautifully and winning every round with the cleaner punches.

I had money on Pac to win that fight, too, so I didn't watch it with biased eyes towards Marquez. Just as when I had money on Shane to beat Oscar in their second fight and I thought Oscar won clearly.

**JoartCC2** · 10-01-2006, 08:11 AM

This argument is moot.

This decision is one of the most corrupt and ludicrous in boxing.

A judge admitted in National TV that he made a "mistake" in scoring the bouts which would have easily gave the fight to PAC. Talk about supreme judging ******ity.

Anyway, this fight happened years ago with a "green" PAC.

If PAC and JMM fights again, PAC will literally tear this puny counter-puncher apart. And there will be more PAC haters and critics who will eat their words and cry mama again.

**dino** · 10-01-2006, 09:44 AM

Originally posted by DiegoFuego

I had it widely in favor of Pacquiao 8 rounds to 4, which makes it 116-109

thats because your a dumbie who dosent know how to score boxing..your the same guy after every big fight saying "such and such got robbed" no they didnt you dont know how to judge boxing

pacquiao won the first 2 or 3 rounds big...after marquez got his style down pact pacquaio didnt win another round

**joeytrimble** · 10-01-2006, 09:59 AM

right you dumbie ...lmao ... pacquio didnt lose rounds 3-12 cause if he did it wouldnt have been 115-113 for jmm now would it ?
surely you cant score a round better then a professional judge could now could ya ?

**Manny_P** · 10-01-2006, 10:00 AM

Originally posted by PRboxingfan

I had JMM winning rounds 3-12. I thought Pac only won the first two. I haven't seen it again since I saw it the first time live, but that's how I remember scoring it.

Maybe I should see it again, but I thought JMM was counterpunching beautifully and winning every round with the cleaner punches.

I had money on Pac to win that fight, too, so I didn't watch it with biased eyes towards Marquez. Just as when I had money on Shane to beat Oscar in their second fight and I thought Oscar won clearly.

i've seen worse scorecards. Mostly by Mexican fight fans who only gave Pac the 1st round.

**chawkins** · 10-01-2006, 10:00 AM

I agree, once JMM figured PAC out, Pac did not make any adjustments. Close fight because of the early (eye catching) knockdowns!!!

**loui_ludwig** · 10-01-2006, 11:42 AM

We all know that the 1 judge didn't know how to score the 1st round. If it was scored correctly, then it would have been a split decision for Pacquiao.

HBO commentators:
Larry Merchant said that he had it a close decision for Pacquiao.
Lederman scored it 115-11O, 7 rounds to 5, for Pacquiao.

Even though with the error of the judge on the 1st round, the fight is a draw.

Your JMM-Pacquiao scorecard