Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paul Williams added to Mayweather vs Baldomir card!!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by ferocity View Post
    I guess you didn't see Margaritos latest interview, go do your homwork.

    Why not say the same about Williams who looks to be bigger then Margarito.
    **** his interview. He has been talking about fighting the best for a long ass time and the best he could come up with this year is ******* Gomez and Joshua Clottey. I'm not believing anything coming out of this man's mouth until the contracts are signed...

    If he can't beat Santos at 154, how does he expect to beat any of the current beltholders which are all better than Santos?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by SiN View Post
      **** his interview. He has been talking about fighting the best for a long ass time and the best he could come up with this year is ******* Gomez and Joshua Clottey. I'm not believing anything coming out of this man's mouth until the contracts are signed...

      If he can't beat Santos at 154, how does he expect to beat any of the current beltholders which are all better than Santos?
      You havn't seen the Santos fight so you can't comment.

      Why doesn't Williams fight David Estrada instead of the nobody he'll be fighting on the undercard of Mayweather/Baldomier?

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by ferocity View Post
        I guess you didn't see Margaritos latest interview, go do your homwork.

        Why not say the same about Williams who looks to be bigger then Margarito.
        Because Williams is calling out someone his own size. Both of them dont belong in the division, HOWEVER, Williams is calling out someone who matches up with him perfectly sizewise/powerwise etc. Your always telling others to "go do their homework" when you get out manuvered in an argument. You never concede to being wrong, ever. You will twist and turn an argument to no end with rarely any factual evidence other than opinion to support your claims. You just cant concede when your wrong and youll look for any way NOT to be wrong even when you are, thus dragging on arguments page after page.

        You know this is the case when we have to argue about "YOU DIDINT SEE THE DANIEL SANTOS FIGHT" as if it really mattered in the boxing world.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Black Jesus View Post
          Because Williams is calling out someone his own size. Both of them dont belong in the division, HOWEVER, Williams is calling out someone who matches up with him perfectly sizewise/powerwise etc. Your always telling others to "go do their homework" when you get out manuvered in an argument. You never concede to being wrong, ever. You will twist and turn an argument to no end with rarely any factual evidence other than opinion to support your claims. You just cant concede when your wrong and youll look for any way NOT to be wrong even when you are, thus dragging on arguments page after page.

          You know this is the case when we have to argue about "YOU DIDINT SEE THE DANIEL SANTOS FIGHT" as if it really mattered in the boxing world.

          that bold part tells me all you are about is paying attention to your favorites and that it, their for limiting you boxing knowlege and awarness of the sport.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by ferocity View Post
            that bold part tells me all you are about is paying attention to your favorites and that it, their for limiting you boxing knowlege and awarness of the sport.
            Do you see what im saying? You underline one Bold part of an entire paragraph and strike an argument out of a sentence that is totally insignifigant to the argument at hand. Daniel Santos vs Antonio Margarito doesnt mean ****. It was a fight that to this day, very few people remember. But thats not the point of what i said, your doing exactly as i said you were doing.

            You desperately reach for something to argue about to make yourself look right when your backed into a corner, all logic doesnt get through to you. Im sorry.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Black Jesus View Post
              Do you see what im saying? You underline one Bold part of an entire paragraph and strike an argument out of a sentence that is totally insignifigant to the argument at hand. Daniel Santos vs Antonio Margarito doesnt mean ****. It was a fight that to this day, very few people remember. But thats not the point of what i said, your doing exactly as i said you were doing.

              You desperately reach for something to argue about to make yourself look right when your backed into a corner, all logic doesnt get through to you. Im sorry.

              I only talked about the bold part causee the rest was bs.

              And if people forgot about santos/margarito then why do the margarito haters always mention the santos fight?

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by ferocity View Post
                I only talked about the bold part causee the rest was bs.

                And if people forgot about santos/margarito then why do the margarito haters always mention the santos fight?
                People bring up the fight that should be forgotten because both of the fighters in the fight should be forgotten. Margarito lost to Santos, isn't fighting his mandatory (who is ranked higher than Clottey), and hasn't beat ONE fighter that ANY casual fan has ever heard of and yet some guys actually believe he is all about fighting the best? Arum did a great job promoting this guy, now its up to him to go out and take advantage and so far he's not.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP