Boxing skill wise, Morales definitely has the edge. Hopefully, Pac will learn some techinical skills, counter punching, and defense.
yea pac is a ****in wild man that dominates by out landing an opponent..he11 one can only take so many..but if the doesnt land then he is useless..thats what exactly is going to happen..
yea pac is a ****in wild man that dominates by out landing an opponent..he11 one can only take so many..but if the doesnt land then he is useless..thats what exactly is going to happen..
Pac will not land? Pac is one of the most accurate punchers in the sport. And he isn't exactly fighting a Jmaes Toney or a Mayweather.
Obviously some of u didn't see the first fight, Erik was playing with him, southpaw and back. I don't think pac can get better, the second fight, I think is was more so condition then pac. No excuse just my opinion. erik is one to the greatest fighters of all time,pac is to ordinary. Marquez came back aginst pac after 3 knockdowns, do u think he would have done the same against Erik ? HELL NO Im not saying pac is a push over, but I see erik winning maybe harder then the first fight, but none the less a decision, or if pac went hollywood, a late ko.
Morales is a great fighter, but he is also clearly past his prime
i think he should have retired after whuppin Pacquiao the first time, but he didnt
Every boxing fan (except the pinoys) respects Morales and i believe him when he says ''believe in me 1 more time''
November 16th will be a special night For Erik ''el terrible'' Morales
what you think
The look on Mayweather's face clearly shows plastic laughter. He talks big but is ***** enough to duck.
But back to the topic.
Define a fighter that is past his prime.
To me a definition of a fighter past his prime is a fighter that has been beaten by bums.
Morales has yet to be beaten by bums.
And looking at how you form your arguments, how ****** can you be.
How can you say that Morales is past his prime but also state that Morales wins against PAC who is by the way approaching his peak.
Hypocrite.
Like so many posters in this site, you're one of the hypocrites.
You try to belittle your fighter because you're afraid he'd lose but still make the conclusion he'd win so that if he'd win, he's great but if he lost, he's past his prime.
I call dumbos like you guys without balls.
You make arguments to belittle your position but deep inside, you're just trying to stave off the humiliation of eating your own words.
Don't you have the balls to set your arguments straight and true without being a hypocrite?
Obviously some of u didn't see the first fight, Erik was playing with him, southpaw and back. I don't think pac can get better, the second fight, I think is was more so condition then pac. No excuse just my opinion. erik is one to the greatest fighters of all time,pac is to ordinary. Marquez came back aginst pac after 3 knockdowns, do u think he would have done the same against Erik ? HELL NO Im not saying pac is a push over, but I see erik winning maybe harder then the first fight, but none the less a decision, or if pac went hollywood, a late ko.
Comment