Tommy Morrison

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -X-
    Kc Chiefs in 09
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 1619
    • 150
    • 79
    • 8,464

    #1

    Tommy Morrison

    What are/were your thoughts on him? pretty short career but he was mildly sucesful.Is known for being on one of the worst ends of a KO in the history of boxing too.
  • joeytrimble
    zipper!
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2003
    • 3941
    • 123
    • 81
    • 10,484

    #2
    Originally posted by Hopkins#1
    What are/were your thoughts on him? pretty short career but he was mildly sucesful.Is known for being on one of the worst ends of a KO in the history of boxing too.
    great left hook ... great heart ...huge party animal ...decent wins

    top 100 all time heavyweight but thats about it for me..

    Comment

    • BuddyChacon
      I CHOKED LINDA LOVELACE
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2006
      • 5123
      • 176
      • 63
      • 13,201

      #3
      Morrison also had a great ability to throw combinations and had great hand speed. He was a big time underacheiver in my opinion. He had alot of tools but never trained like he should have and had stamina problems because of it. In the Mercer fight he threw some of the best combinations I have seen from a heavyweight but just ran out of gas and was pummeled.

      Comment

      • ZOSOOSOZ
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2005
        • 136
        • 11
        • 5
        • 6,789

        #4
        Originally posted by joeytrimble
        great left hook ...
        Morrison/Ruddock: one of the greatest left hooks of all time...

        Comment

        • SnoopySmurf
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 4428
          • 380
          • 78
          • 34,616

          #5
          Mercer got lucky. He had just beaten Fabrice Tiozzi (I think) and Mercer was getting his ass handed to him as well until he threw an uppercut that barely touched Fabrice's face. But it did push his nose cartilage out of his nose. End of fight.

          Morrison was a juicer too.

          Comment

          • BuddyChacon
            I CHOKED LINDA LOVELACE
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 5123
            • 176
            • 63
            • 13,201

            #6
            Originally posted by SnoopySmurf
            Mercer got lucky. He had just beaten Fabrice Tiozzi (I think) and Mercer was getting his ass handed to him as well until he threw an uppercut that barely touched Fabrice's face. But it did push his nose cartilage out of his nose. End of fight.

            Morrison was a juicer too.
            It was Francesco Damiani that was beating Mercer till he threw that uppercut. Morrison was a big time admitted Steroid user.

            Comment

            • K-DOGG
              Mitakuye Oyasin
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 5851
              • 406
              • 396
              • 25,885

              #7
              Originally posted by Hopkins#1
              What are/were your thoughts on him? pretty short career but he was mildly sucesful.Is known for being on one of the worst ends of a KO in the history of boxing too.
              I think he had the talent to go all the way; but had a serious psychological flaw...confidence, which very well might have been put there by his crushing loss to Mercer. If you'll remember, that was the only true knock-out of his career, the rest were TKO's.....that means his chin, believe it or not, was average before Mercer. The Mercer fight gave him a psychological flaw, it shattered or at least dented his confidence. Part of being able to take a punch is belief......if you don't believe the other guy can hurt you, or more specifically, if YOU BELIEVE THE OTHER GUY CAN'T hurt you.....most of the time he can't, unless he hits you with something superb.

              The Mercer fight instilled self-doubt, which reared it's ugly head every time Tommy got tagged from that fight on. It's nothing to be ashamed of....very few fighters ever fully recover from that kind of loss and Tommy was no different.

              Other than the psychological flaw of self-doubt following the Mercer loss, Tommy's other big problem was lack of versatility. While it is true he was able to out-box old, slow, George Foreman by using a tried and true method....hit and run, he was essentialy a one-dimensional fighter with no plan B.

              History-wise, I'll say he was a good contender along the same lines as an Earnie Shavers or a Mac Foster or a Bob Satterfield.

              Comment

              • joeytrimble
                zipper!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2003
                • 3941
                • 123
                • 81
                • 10,484

                #8
                Originally posted by K-DOGG
                I think he had the talent to go all the way; but had a serious psychological flaw...confidence, which very well might have been put there by his crushing loss to Mercer. If you'll remember, that was the only true knock-out of his career, the rest were TKO's.....that means his chin, believe it or not, was average before Mercer. The Mercer fight gave him a psychological flaw, it shattered or at least dented his confidence. Part of being able to take a punch is belief......if you don't believe the other guy can hurt you, or more specifically, if YOU BELIEVE THE OTHER GUY CAN'T hurt you.....most of the time he can't, unless he hits you with something superb.

                The Mercer fight instilled self-doubt, which reared it's ugly head every time Tommy got tagged from that fight on. It's nothing to be ashamed of....very few fighters ever fully recover from that kind of loss and Tommy was no different.

                Other than the psychological flaw of self-doubt following the Mercer loss, Tommy's other big problem was lack of versatility. While it is true he was able to out-box old, slow, George Foreman by using a tried and true method....hit and run, he was essentialy a one-dimensional fighter with no plan B.

                History-wise, I'll say he was a good contender along the same lines as an Earnie Shavers or a Mac Foster or a Bob Satterfield.
                i never looked at it that way but your absaultly right man

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP