MAn u got to be an idiot if u dont think barrear is an all time greaqt fighter. He had a bad night with pac so what? he has won titles in 3 diferent divisions....
he is a good fighter, but not an all time great at all..........
all of his big fights he won by a round, or controversially by a round!..not to mention him being demolished by pacman...man that was a brutal beating!!...
NO.. he is an all time great.. definately one of the best feathers and super feathers ever..
hes older now.. looking out more for his health.. what does he have to prove at this point at his career?
u obviously havent seen some of barerras fights.. hes a great boxers and an exciting brawler.. i suggest u check out his fights..
he was the only good fighter hamed faced in his entire career. Hamed is not an all-time great more like an all-time fraud. barrera is a very good fighter but I wouldn't mention him in the same breath as hagler, hearns, leonard, or pbf. He had some good wins but some brutal losses,and he never fought at 135 so we will never know how good he could have been. three titles in three weights is impressive, but five titles in five divisions is so much more impressive
Barrera is top 5 p4p.. a list hes been on for almost a decade
top 10 yes top 5 I don't think so, I rate corrales and castillo higher than barrera and morales, due to the fact they faced and beat more dangerous opposition
They way Barrera estabilsh himself after Pacquio loss was very good he beat Morales, Ayalie, Monza and Penden and now Jaruez.
Yes he had some brutal loss but a champ is someone who stands up even if he cant. That is why its exciting to see boxing because of some fighters comebacks that make it impressive. For example what if Holyfield won a title that would make him on the the best boxing of the 21st centery.
Barrera is an adaptive fighter he could esaily adapt to his opponent the loss where came in a way because he did had a gameplan for that opponent in mind.
If Barrera faced Pacquio in the coming month all the people will forget him about the Jaruz fight. Just because one fight he didnt brawl doesnt loss his statues in boxing history
dude roldan.... you do realize that if you land ten more punches than i do in the rounds you win and i land only 2 more punches than you do in the rounds i win, and i win 7 of 12 rounds i'll win with you landing about 40 more puches than i did? Compu box stats are cool to read but they dont tell you what really happened in the fight. (just responding to your avartar)
Comment