Joan Guzman vs.Jorge Barrios (spoiler)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JoartCC2
    Proud to be GAY!!!!
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2006
    • 362
    • 32
    • 0
    • 6,633

    #21
    Originally posted by SalvaDominicano
    well.. we all know pac always loses because he gets over-aggressive. Who is the only person that can beat him by using his over-aggressiveness against him??? hmm.... idk.....

    barrios is the toughest person in boxing today. i mean he got hit with sledgehammers all night and was only wobbled a few times. U might say a few times?? thats a lot but if u really saw the punches he was taking u would understand.

    in other words.. pac wouldnt be able to take the same beating he gave barrios or vice versa.. i dont think anyone would be able to take the beatings pac gives out but guzman doesnt have to because hes a boxer. i would put my money on guzman simply cuz of my dominican pride but its 50/50 at this pt.
    He always loses because of his over-agressiveness? lols!

    Have you been watching PAC fight?

    The only way to win against PAC is to push him back. Morales and Larios knew that.

    Any fighter who elects to try to counter-punch a southpaw like PAC will get ripped piece by piece. PAC will just tear him apart with his moves. The right overhand which makes jabs useless, the head movement with a feint body attack which turns into a deadly lead straight left to the face, lols!

    The only way to beat PAC is to prevent him from punching. Once PAC unleashes his 4-5-6 combos, trying to counter one of them will get you tagged by the back-end of those combos.

    I can't wait for MAB to get it on finally.

    Comment

    • SalvaDominicano
      Future Middleweight Champ
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2004
      • 2071
      • 92
      • 45
      • 9,317

      #22
      OMG!!! DID ANYONE REMEMBER THE 11TH RD???!! HOLY CRAP I FELT BAD FOR BARRIOS...

      Comment

      • SalvaDominicano
        Future Middleweight Champ
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2004
        • 2071
        • 92
        • 45
        • 9,317

        #23
        Originally posted by JoartCC2
        He always loses because of his over-agressiveness? lols!

        Have you been watching PAC fight?

        The only way to win against PAC is to push him back. Morales and Larios knew that.

        Any fighter who elects to try to counter-punch a southpaw like PAC will get ripped piece by piece. PAC will just tear him apart with his moves. The right overhand which makes jabs useless, the head movement with a feint body attack which turns into a deadly lead straight left to the face, lols!

        The only way to beat PAC is to prevent him from punching. Once PAC unleashes his 4-5-6 combos, trying to counter one of them will get you tagged by the back-end of those combos.

        I can't wait for MAB to get it on finally.

        damn can u let go of the nuts for a sec...? it wasnt meant to take anything away from him but all of his fights except for one he lost because he got over-aggressive. am i wrong? no need to freak out like that man.

        yea maybe u r right but he never fought a boxer like guzman and remember a good boxer beats a good puncher.

        Comment

        • JoartCC2
          Proud to be GAY!!!!
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jul 2006
          • 362
          • 32
          • 0
          • 6,633

          #24
          Originally posted by SalvaDominicano
          damn can u let go of the nuts for a sec...? it wasnt meant to take anything away from him but all of his fights except for one he lost because he got over-aggressive. am i wrong? no need to freak out like that man.

          yea maybe u r right but he never fought a boxer like guzman and remember a good boxer beats a good puncher.
          He lost to Morales not because he was over-aggresive.

          He lost because he did'nt have his gloves, Morales had a good plan and he was distracted.

          He validated that by beating the **** out of Morales.

          Keep your arguments straight.

          Comment

          • chito
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Apr 2004
            • 900
            • 531
            • 270
            • 14,864

            #25
            Originally posted by SalvaDominicano
            damn can u let go of the nuts for a sec...? it wasnt meant to take anything away from him but all of his fights except for one he lost because he got over-aggressive. am i wrong? no need to freak out like that man.

            yea maybe u r right but he never fought a boxer like guzman and remember a good boxer beats a good puncher.
            and guzman never fought a fighter like pac, same thing. i hope this fight becomes a reality so we would know who's really the best among the two.

            Comment

            • Shanus
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 14918
              • 997
              • 1,217
              • 18,545

              #26
              Originally posted by chito
              and guzman never fought a fighter like pac, same thing. i hope this fight becomes a reality so we would know who's really the best among the two.
              And Pac has never fought a fighter like Guzman.

              Guzman has GREAT defense, his reactions are unbelievable, and he has speed like SRL.

              Comment

              • 2OSouzaSuarez12
                HATTONS NUMBER 1 FAN!
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 1569
                • 90
                • 78
                • 8,044

                #27
                I knew Guzman would win this fight. Man i thought he was gogin to KO Barrios in the 1st round at first. Guzman did showboat way to much and I know he can fight better than that. Trust me, the best is yet to come. But what impressed me a lot if Guzman's chin. He moved up in weight and fought a huge 130 pounder who didnt even make weight and balooned up to around 150. For a guy who fought at 122 not long ago, his ability to take a punch and hang in there with a big guy like that impressed me. I scored the fight 8-4 for Guzman. Great fight too I really enjoyed it.

                Comment

                • SalvaDominicano
                  Future Middleweight Champ
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 2071
                  • 92
                  • 45
                  • 9,317

                  #28
                  Originally posted by JoartCC2
                  He lost to Morales not because he was over-aggresive.

                  He lost because he did'nt have his gloves, Morales had a good plan and he was distracted.

                  He validated that by beating the **** out of Morales.

                  Keep your arguments straight.

                  right... how bout u learn how to read... okay?? read my post again. i said he lost all of his fights except one because of over-aggressiveness. if u need a clue, that one fight was the morales fight. how bout u keep your arguments straight. damn nuthuggers...

                  Comment

                  • JoartCC2
                    Proud to be GAY!!!!
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 362
                    • 32
                    • 0
                    • 6,633

                    #29
                    Originally posted by SalvaDominicano
                    right... how bout u learn how to read... okay?? read my post again. i said he lost all of his fights except one because of over-aggressiveness. if u need a clue, that one fight was the morales fight. how bout u keep your arguments straight. damn nuthuggers...
                    Why don't you use a little more common sense.

                    I don't need to elaborate it. You're already a big kid and spoon-feeding explanations isn't necessary on you.

                    Comment

                    • kg21mvp
                      QC's Finest
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 0
                      • 129
                      • 151
                      • 13,182

                      #30
                      barrios got robbed in this fight! he clearly won except for the point he lost where he made a low blow..even the commentators were saying that he won! greatest robbery of the year! barrios completely outboxed guzman!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP