Originally posted by Bozo_no no
Hagler or SRR.......Who fought better opposition?
Collapse
-
Polls? As I said, lets see a link.Originally posted by Gunstar1Just look at all the polls on the internet, I personally had it for Leonard by a point, but still most polls have Hagler winning the fight.
I had Leonard winning the fight and I think most people were split evenly on it.Comment
-
What link, go look it up yourself, I told you all the polls have Hagler winning the fight and you've seen this yourself!Originally posted by Bozo_no noPolls? As I said, lets see a link.
I had Leonard winning the fight and I think most people were split evenly on it.Comment
-
Originally posted by Gunstar1What link, go look it up yourself, I told you all the polls have Hagler winning the fight and you've seen this yourself!
You told me "most polls have Hagler winning the fight" and I asked for a link to any of these polls.
I've seen no such polls, that's why I asked for the link.
I'm not interested in researching claims you make that you seem unable to back up.
Like I said, lets see these "polls".
Comment
-
-
Go to www.doghouseboxing.com they recently had a poll.Originally posted by Bozo_no noYou told me "most polls have Hagler winning the fight" and I asked for a link to any of these polls.
I've seen no such polls, that's why I asked for the link.
I'm not interested in researching claims you make that you seem unable to back up.
Like I said, lets see these "polls".

Comment
-
-
I have to say Hagler, because his best opponents alone are better and have a greater legacy than Robinson's.
If Leonard wasn't the same when he fought Hagler after his retirement, then tell me what was diffirent about his physical abilities as a fighter.
If Duran was past it, tell me why he was so succesfull at a much older age, and how HIS physical abilities as a fighter were not the same.Comment
-
Leonard could only fight in spurts, and was without question at his best at welterweight. He fought constantly for 15 rounds with Duran, that was a very different fighter to the Leonard that fought Hagler. But IMO Hagler was very slow and at the end of his career anyway.Originally posted by YamanI have to say Hagler, because his best opponents alone are better and have a greater legacy than Robinson's.
If Leonard wasn't the same when he fought Hagler after his retirement, then tell me what was diffirent about his physical abilities as a fighter.
If Duran was past it, tell me why he was so succesfull at a much older age, and how HIS physical abilities as a fighter were not the same.
Duran well......just watch Duran at Lightweight. Seriously.
When people talk about him as an all time great. Its not him at middleweight or welterweight. Its wen he was a lightweight IN THE 70'S!Comment
Comment