Ok I dont get it. Why the hell do I read this in every article out there?
Now every clown and expert on the block tends to agree that Peter rabbit punches his opponents. What triggered that? The Wlad fight. However few acknowledged that during the Wlad Vs Peter bout.
But now that Toney fought him everyone is all over Peter for rabbit punching.
So why the hell do all these writers write about Peter's knockdowns of Wlad as legit?
Why dont they write "despite Peter's 3 illegal knockdowns of Wlad"...why do the continue to make it sound like they were legal?
When it's Wlad its legal when its Toney its illegal...
The hate is just ammusing...
Now every clown and expert on the block tends to agree that Peter rabbit punches his opponents. What triggered that? The Wlad fight. However few acknowledged that during the Wlad Vs Peter bout.
But now that Toney fought him everyone is all over Peter for rabbit punching.
So why the hell do all these writers write about Peter's knockdowns of Wlad as legit?
Why dont they write "despite Peter's 3 illegal knockdowns of Wlad"...why do the continue to make it sound like they were legal?
When it's Wlad its legal when its Toney its illegal...
The hate is just ammusing...

Comment