I have seen countless "JT got robbed" posts and I really don't feel like going through all of them, so I'll start my own thread. First, I want to say that I am not a big fan of either guy although in terms of skill Toney is incredible. His defense is tremendous and his counterpunching is a gift. However, I think Peter was succesful in doing something other boxers could not and that's bullying Toney on the ropes. True that Toney still made his masterful counters work, but I don't remember any other opponent being so succesful at landing good shots while JT was on the ropes. Jirov was close but not really like Peter. Sam made the fight sloppy at times, which worked great for him and made for a close, action packed bout.
All in all I did not see a robbery, since I saw Peter win a razor thin 114-113 decision, but I don't agree with that 116-111 Peter scorecard. That was way off. To me, Peter got a close call that could have gone either way. Toney brought the skills, Peter the brute force and it was one of those rare ocassions when strenght surpassed science, although narrowly.
All in all I did not see a robbery, since I saw Peter win a razor thin 114-113 decision, but I don't agree with that 116-111 Peter scorecard. That was way off. To me, Peter got a close call that could have gone either way. Toney brought the skills, Peter the brute force and it was one of those rare ocassions when strenght surpassed science, although narrowly.
Comment