Isn't that strange that two big fights got a Split Decision and people say robbery.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LiLHopkins
    The King of Uploads
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2006
    • 3827
    • 185
    • 132
    • 10,755

    #1

    Isn't that strange that two big fights got a Split Decision and people say robbery.

    The match between Johnson vs. Woods. Woods got the Split Decision. and people that aren't even Johnson fans say he won.

    And James Toney vs. Samuel Peter. With Peter getting a split decision. and people that are not even Toney fans and some that even hate him says he should have won. WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • maxorido
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2006
    • 772
    • 26
    • 49
    • 7,140

    #2
    they need to tighten up these ****in judges man. some of these judges don't know wtf they are watching, and are obviously bought off or influenced by don king, betting people, other promoters etc.

    Comment

    • LiLHopkins
      The King of Uploads
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2006
      • 3827
      • 185
      • 132
      • 10,755

      #3
      Originally posted by maxorido
      they need to tighten up these ****in judges man. some of these judges don't know wtf they are watching, and are obviously bought off or influenced by don king, betting people, other promoters etc.

      But stilll I don't get that ****. with the Split Decisions.

      Comment

      • bakey321
        Contender
        • Aug 2006
        • 243
        • 17
        • 1
        • 6,467

        #4
        People need to understand that the judges don't have the luxury of seeing the fight from all the angles on TV or from above the ring either. Judges have 1 view of the fight and can't see everything that we see. I'm not defending them, but people jump to conclusions without thinking about these things. And yes, Toney should have won a CLOSE decision.

        Comment

        • LiLHopkins
          The King of Uploads
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 3827
          • 185
          • 132
          • 10,755

          #5
          Originally posted by bakey321
          People need to understand that the judges don't have the luxury of seeing the fight from all the angles on TV or from above the ring either. Judges have 1 view of the fight and can't see everything that we see. I'm not defending them, but people jump to conclusions without thinking about these things. And yes, Toney should have won a CLOSE decision.

          Yeah I know what you mean, but still Those scores was too damn wide. Good post though good k on the way.

          Comment

          • maxorido
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 772
            • 26
            • 49
            • 7,140

            #6
            Originally posted by bakey321
            People need to understand that the judges don't have the luxury of seeing the fight from all the angles on TV or from above the ring either. Judges have 1 view of the fight and can't see everything that we see. I'm not defending them, but people jump to conclusions without thinking about these things. And yes, Toney should have won a CLOSE decision.
            i didn't see the johnson and woods fight so i can't comment on that. but i don't give a damn what angle you saw the toney vs peter fight, 116-111 with a point deduction is ****ing suspect.

            Comment

            • !!! Beowulf !!!
              What's the time Mr. Wolf?
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 3346
              • 803
              • 1,658
              • 14,425

              #7
              Woods was good value for the win, Johnson gave away the last three rounds and with that any chance of victory. The judge that scored it for Johnson is Frank Warren's "go-to-guy".

              Comment

              • iron mike tyson
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2005
                • 2056
                • 82
                • 54
                • 8,961

                #8
                yah micky van scored it for johnson for sum reason

                Comment

                • Shanus
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 14918
                  • 997
                  • 1,217
                  • 18,545

                  #9
                  Woods/Johnson was most definately not a robbery.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP