More controversial decision: Floyd-Castillo 1 or Pac-Marquez 3?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brother Mouzone
    Where's my Harper's ?
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2005
    • 12710
    • 4,643
    • 3,340
    • 55,431

    #11
    Originally posted by LeOoze
    If I'm gonna be honest. I thought Floyd beat Castillo and I thought Pac beat Marquez on their 3rd meeting.
    ^^^ This .........

    Comment

    • HewJohnson
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2019
      • 4354
      • 404
      • 2
      • 125,484

      #12
      Originally posted by famicommander
      Floyd won a close fight that could've been scored a draw.

      Pacquiao got given a gift just like he did in the first two Marquez fights.
      PAC won the first two fights against Marquez, everybody knows this.

      You’re an idiot.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30538
        • 2,200
        • 924
        • 105,596

        #13
        Floyd v Castillo was worse. Pac best jm m x2 already and a 3rd fight wasn't warranted.
        Whilst Castillo shouldn't have been robbed in first place

        Comment

        • pasawayako
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 15348
          • 639
          • 194
          • 151,963

          #14
          This is not even close. Pac beat jmm clearly while floyd was manhandled by castillo.

          Comment

          • Santa_
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2015
            • 14673
            • 1,417
            • 378
            • 143,233

            #15
            Oh Floyd-Castillo without a doubt. Pac-Marquez wasn't a blatant robbery, I'd actually say it was somewhat close.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP