Is Canelo’s path w/ BJS, Plant more “challenging” than Crawford’s Indongo Undisputed?

[Thuglife Nelo]

We don’t need to mention lighter Postol to bigger Smith wins, those fights are crossed out. Canelo has a road path of Yildirim, BJS, and Plant for Undisputed. Indongo had two belts because of Burns... I’d pick Easter Jr to have beaten Indongo at 140...

So are BJS and Plant, both undefeated, should Canelo win, better than Crawford’s win over Indongo?

The LDBc’s justification for Crawford over Canelo is because of the “Undisputed” win. So if Canelo becomes Undisputed, what are they going to say? They call Canelo a cheat yet still acknowledge and rank Canelo as top 3. If they feel he is a cheat they wouldn’t even acknowledge him as P4P, therefore, should Canelo become Undisputed what will be their reason? Complexion for the deflection?

[Ochoa780]

Yes they are

[techliam]

Yes but you’re comparing a weak potential Undisputed run to one of the weakest runs in recent memory

Plant has no resume, at all. He would rightly be disregarded if he lost hard to Canelo, because he barely has a contender resume, never mind a champion one

Saunders is a stylistic challenge, but again has no resume, at least at 168. His 160 raises him above the likes of Plant but not by a massive margin

Compare it to a decent Undisputed run instead

[Thuglife Nelo]

Yes but you’re comparing a weak potential Undisputed run to one of the weakest runs in recent memory

Plant has no resume, at all. He would rightly be disregarded if he lost hard to Canelo, because he barely has a contender resume, never mind a champion one

Saunders is a stylistic challenge, but again has no resume, at least at 168. His 160 raises him above the likes of Plant but not by a massive margin

Compare it to a decent Undisputed run instead

I gave context as to why I mentioned Indongo