Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Boxing Might Not Be Able To Ignore Daniel Kinahan Issue

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    It wasnt an issue until Fury fell out with the *****phile ring known as the BBC though was it? Strange..

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by CmdrSoCal View Post
      Are not Tyson Fury's father and uncle drug smugglers? But these guys can be completely trusted not to rig fights.
      Come on now Deontay,not this again..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Mindgames View Post
        Come on now Deontay,not this again..
        he he he he he he ha ha ...funny1

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Scopedog View Post
          If they've got incriminating information on this guy, then they need to send it to the cops so that he can be arrested, then the matter can be decided in criminal court. Anything else is just a waste of everyone's time.
          Which cops do they send it to? This is not a simple matter. Organised crime thrives on the concept of giving up if it's not a simple open and shut case. This is why they layer money. This is why they set up complex organisations across multiple national boundaries. This is why they intimidate witnesses. This is why they utilise expendable lackeys to enforce their rackets.

          Sky and BT Sport are substantial organisations with substantial resources available to make an informed decision of whether they are getting into bed with a mob boss. They need to investigate the matter, make their decision and be ready to live with the consequences of their decision.

          If it really needs to be spelled out: no matter how much of a history boxing has with the mob, knowingly dealing with a mob boss now is wrong.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Scopedog View Post
            If they've got incriminating information on this guy, then they need to send it to the cops so that he can be arrested, then the matter can be decided in criminal court. Anything else is just a waste of everyone's time.
            Sometimes there is no smoke without fire. Most mafia fgures have never been prosecuted for being mafia. Yet, everyone knew who not to mess with and why. BBC is not The Sun or any other shltty tabloid. They weigh in what they are saying. It’s ok to stay on the fence about the guy, but let’s not praise him as an angel just because he’s never been found guilty.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Mindgames View Post
              It wasnt an issue until Fury fell out with the *****phile ring known as the BBC though was it? Strange..
              Are you on crack?

              Comment


              • #27
                How do you deal with a probable criminal with no record? Broner has committed more crimes than this guy & we still dealing with him.

                Seems like a compelling story, but idk that you can ban him from the sport or whatever without some more serious evidence against him specifically.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by alexjust View Post
                  Are you on crack?
                  Guess you've never heard of Jimmy Saville ,Rolf Harris ,Ovendun ,the statue outside company house of a naked boy in a sexual position with a man that was made by a *****phile? Nah ,go back to sleep.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by alexjust View Post
                    Sometimes there is no smoke without fire. Most mafia fgures have never been prosecuted for being mafia. Yet, everyone knew who not to mess with and why. BBC is not The Sun or any other shltty tabloid. They weigh in what they are saying. It’s ok to stay on the fence about the guy, but let’s not praise him as an angel just because he’s never been found guilty.
                    The people who brought you a video game and passed it off as Gadaffli testing hes new weapons.They have spread more disinformation than their fair share and covered up for Saville for years.You wont get away with brushing it under the carpet, the cats out the bag and their credibility is in the bin.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      anyone got a link to the BBC doc in question?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP