Im going to post a typical excuse ppl make around here for Canelo beating an unprecedented number of champs in a row in 3 divisions.(NoBody has ever to my knowledge faced 6 champs in a row in 3 divisions straight (only Fielding was ranked below #2 champ)And considering Yildirim is a 1 month notice tuneup BJS will make 7.
This from thread of Fury saying Saunders loses due to inactivity:
For almost every champ Canelo was fighting,haters would make threads claiming Canelo somehow gains an advantage by fighting champs on short notice (as if he wasn't ducked by Saunders & Plant after mos of negotiations), despite him being the 1 with the huge disadvantage of fighting back to back power punching champs,& despite it being so ****** to think hes aware of whos going to duck or drop out like saunders did last yr.
Well in this case Canelo is fighting Yildirim 1 &1/2 mos after lineal Smith,hes then going to fight BJS less than 3 mos after that,& Saunders gets a full 5 mo camp & has already been preparing since last yr since he ducked.(he used the Goerge Costanza school of negotiating)
So where are the same haters at now,I hear NoBody crying that Saunders is getting an unfair advantage. So the goalposts moved again,& now the excuse is" Canelo fighting an inactive Saunders despite them both fighting in December & despite Tīts getting over a yrs notice at this pt "
This from thread of Fury saying Saunders loses due to inactivity:
Originally posted by hugh grant
View Post
This is really weak post,So Canelo is now supposed to make sure his champ opponents are at their best before he fights them? What happened to the excuse that he doesn't give them enough training camp,Canelo literally has given BJS over a yrs notice at this point (Because BJS backed out of their fight after dragging negotiations for months)
Canelo is now giving Saunders 5 months to prepare, despite Canelo himself slaying the lineal smw champ & fighting his mando on 1 months notice,then he has to go right back to camp to fight Saunders in May. But somehow in your biased view Canelo"fights ppl not at their best" gtfoh.
So now when Saunders gets beat the excuse is already written for Billy Tīts Saunders,poor Tīts if only he was given a full yr contract where hes allowed to fight jobbers,(even though we know the excuse would revert back to Canelo fighting him after he stunk up the joint,or the age old"not enough time to train excuse"
Do you actually listen to the bs excuses youall come up with?
Canelo is now giving Saunders 5 months to prepare, despite Canelo himself slaying the lineal smw champ & fighting his mando on 1 months notice,then he has to go right back to camp to fight Saunders in May. But somehow in your biased view Canelo"fights ppl not at their best" gtfoh.
So now when Saunders gets beat the excuse is already written for Billy Tīts Saunders,poor Tīts if only he was given a full yr contract where hes allowed to fight jobbers,(even though we know the excuse would revert back to Canelo fighting him after he stunk up the joint,or the age old"not enough time to train excuse"
Do you actually listen to the bs excuses youall come up with?

For almost every champ Canelo was fighting,haters would make threads claiming Canelo somehow gains an advantage by fighting champs on short notice (as if he wasn't ducked by Saunders & Plant after mos of negotiations), despite him being the 1 with the huge disadvantage of fighting back to back power punching champs,& despite it being so ****** to think hes aware of whos going to duck or drop out like saunders did last yr.
Well in this case Canelo is fighting Yildirim 1 &1/2 mos after lineal Smith,hes then going to fight BJS less than 3 mos after that,& Saunders gets a full 5 mo camp & has already been preparing since last yr since he ducked.(he used the Goerge Costanza school of negotiating)
So where are the same haters at now,I hear NoBody crying that Saunders is getting an unfair advantage. So the goalposts moved again,& now the excuse is" Canelo fighting an inactive Saunders despite them both fighting in December & despite Tīts getting over a yrs notice at this pt "

Comment