They said the same about Wilder who is quicker and longer than AJ. AJ will have a hard time landing on a taller, longer Fury. AJ will not be able to walk him down as he does with every other opponent and we know that Fury can take a punch as well as deflect it enough to not take serious damage. AJ will have to dig deep on this one similar to what he had to do to overcome the KD against Wladimir.
Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury Wants KO: Everything in My Favor Against Anthony Joshua!
Collapse
-
-
Anyway, I’m bored with that, lukey by ko and you’re mum by sodomy.Comment
-
If fury is not on his special meat supplement then just how are those pillow fists gonna harm AJ? He might win in another snoozefest where he dances all night like a fairy flicking a right out every now and then like he did vs old man klitsko. Otherwise, no chance. Joshua will crush him in a real tearup.Comment
-
Eh, if he doesn't neglect lateral movement while pressuring, doesn't go for too many mid-range exchanges and goes for some tricky shots from weird angles every now and again then why not. A lot also depends on how AJ reacts to being pressured and what approach he takes to the fight. Push comes to shove, I believe Fury is capable of adapting and changing tactics should something not work out as planned.
Though I still think that what he did vs Klitschko would work against AJ as well, perhaps even better, but I won't be the one doing the fighting so whatever.Comment
-
-
Let’s hope fury decides to trade with Joshua because he will get knocked spark out....Joshua will brutally end him with his timingComment
-
AJ needs to stick to short, undersized 40+ year olds if he wants to win.Comment
-
Comment
-
If a criminal runs away from justice and never gets caught he was never a criminal?
He is a career criminal but not a convicted criminal.
No criminal convictions doesn't mean he isn't a criminal, you clearly have no idea how the world works.
If you saw a kiddie fiddler abducting a child, would you leave him to it as he hasn't been convicted yet so is innocent? You couldn't intervene because he is innocent until proven guilty. Oh right, society doesn't have the same burden of proof as the criminal courts do, so you would hopefully have the courage to do something first.
What if he assaults the child and runs away never to be caught? Does that mean a crime never took place and doesn't become one until a conviction?Last edited by Angeljuice; 02-02-2021, 09:00 PM.Comment
-
I love sharing nonsense with you, but try and find something original to talk nonsense about, you have posted the same nonsense message 2,374 times.
Come on, dig deep, I'm sure there's plenty of nonsense in that ridiculous mind of yours.Comment
Comment