Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Josh Warrington Furious With Xu Can's Refusal To Fight Behind Closed Doors

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
    So you can't even answer to your own comment after i asked? Of course you can't, hence why i said it was a joke comment.

    This actually makes no sense. A question would prove or disprove whether i was a casual or not? No, it doesn't. But your deflection and lack of intellect proves your IQ is f3cking casual.

    You may continue writing nonsense without point or reason just for the sake of it because Eddie makes you feel like a little boy who can't control his emotions.
    Now Warrington has vacated his title and is fighting a no name haha. Absolutely awful decision to sign with Eddie Hearn.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by DJS View Post
      Now Warrington has vacated his title and is fighting a no name haha. Absolutely awful decision to sign with Eddie Hearn.
      Warrington vacated his IBF title because Galahad is his mandatory and he doesn't want to fight him again so soon after the last one. And with it being a shlt show, i agree with him. But being with Eddie isn't the problem here. Galahad would still be his mandatory regardless of who he's with. So you're still talking a load of nonsense.

      Warrington is fighting the Mexican to shed some ring rust and get back into the swing of things. He doesn't want to be out doing nothing. That would be stupid.

      When you deflect after i questioned you about your comment, it's best not to then come back with a strawman argument. It's self defeating in the worse way. Maybe ask your helper next time to give you some tips on how not be a complete moron. That way, i won't laugh as hard when you post.

      Now get back to those windows, they're not going to lick themselves clean are they?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
        Warrington vacated his IBF title because Galahad is his mandatory and he doesn't want to fight him again so soon after the last one. And with it being a shlt show, i agree with him. But being with Eddie isn't the problem here. Galahad would still be his mandatory regardless of who he's with. So you're still talking a load of nonsense.

        Warrington is fighting the Mexican to shed some ring rust and get back into the swing of things. He doesn't want to be out doing nothing. That would be stupid.

        When you deflect after i questioned you about your comment, it's best not to then come back with a strawman argument. It's self defeating in the worse way. Maybe ask your helper next time to give you some tips on how not be a complete moron. That way, i won't laugh as hard when you post.

        Now get back to those windows, they're not going to lick themselves clean are they?
        Only new boxing fans defend and support promoters. The facts are the facts. Signed over a year ago, zero fights and now no world title, fighting a road sweeper in his Matchroom debut. Pathetic! Same thing happened to Liam Smith when he joined Matchroom.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by DJS View Post
          Only new boxing fans defend and support promoters. The facts are the facts. Signed over a year ago, zero fights and now no world title, fighting a road sweeper in his Matchroom debut. Pathetic! Same thing happened to Liam Smith when he joined Matchroom.
          Can was the one who didn't want to fight without a crowd. That is not Eddie or Warrington's fault.

          Who would Warren have got him if he was there, huh?

          You're the one who brought up the subject of a promoter being better in Warren over another. So now you're projecting like i was the one who did so in the first place. It wasn't, it was you. You defended Warren and thought better of him than you did Eddie with no valid reason just to spew your biased hate. When i asked you to tell me what Warren would have done better, you deflected like crazy.

          Warren is a scum bag with a low rent set-up. He's the one who f3cked over so many fighters and went bankrupt just so he didn't have to pay his fighters the money owed. Also, when they left him, he slandered them in the press. He's well known for doing this to a good handful of his fighters. Only someone new to the game wouldn't know this. So nice try, kid. But you lose again.

          Comment


          • #35
            A shame Can wasn't ready to go, it could of been a fun fight.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
              Can was the one who didn't want to fight without a crowd. That is not Eddie or Warrington's fault.

              Who would Warren have got him if he was there, huh?

              You're the one who brought up the subject of a promoter being better in Warren over another. So now you're projecting like i was the one who did so in the first place. It wasn't, it was you. You defended Warren and thought better of him than you did Eddie with no valid reason just to spew your biased hate. When i asked you to tell me what Warren would have done better, you deflected like crazy.

              Warren is a scum bag with a low rent set-up. He's the one who f3cked over so many fighters and went bankrupt just so he didn't have to pay his fighters the money owed. Also, when they left him, he slandered them in the press. He's well known for doing this to a good handful of his fighters. Only someone new to the game wouldn't know this. So nice try, kid. But you lose again.
              Bloody hell newbie, this promoter stuff really gets to you. That is how I can tell you are a new fan. Warrington boxed Selby, Frampton, Galahad under Warren. Joined Hearn and lost his title and fights a no mark. Facts are the facts. Accept it Matchroom casual newbie. Worst type of new Internet bum ass fan, supporting promoters. What a joke.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DJS View Post
                Bloody hell newbie, this promoter stuff really gets to you. That is how I can tell you are a new fan. Warrington boxed Selby, Frampton, Galahad under Warren. Joined Hearn and lost his title and fights a no mark. Facts are the facts. Accept it Matchroom casual newbie. Worst type of new Internet bum ass fan, supporting promoters. What a joke.
                I'm supporting the truth you idiot.

                Projecting doesn't make you look clued up about the sport, it sticks out like a sore thumb and convinces no one. Only casuals call others that to make it look like they're long time fans of the sport. Which i am as i've been watching from pretty much 1990. You clearly have only come on board recently. It shows in the most horrible way.

                There's a pandemic on you f3cking cabbage. That changes things very clearly. Duh. The can fight was go until all this happened. Duh. get it now? Duh.

                You still didn't answer how Warren would do differently if Warrington was still with him? Nor did you get the fact you're supporting Warren with unfounded nonsense that you refuse to try and answer in a fit of extreme irony.

                Give it up, you're convincing no one. Stop embarrassing yourself.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by sid-knee View Post
                  i'm supporting the truth you idiot.

                  Projecting doesn't make you look clued up about the sport, it sticks out like a sore thumb and convinces no one. Only casuals call others that to make it look like they're long time fans of the sport. Which i am as i've been watching from pretty much 1990. You clearly have only come on board recently. It shows in the most horrible way.

                  There's a pandemic on you f3cking cabbage. That changes things very clearly. Duh. The can fight was go until all this happened. Duh. Get it now? Duh.

                  You still didn't answer how warren would do differently if warrington was still with him? Nor did you get the fact you're supporting warren with unfounded nonsense that you refuse to try and answer in a fit of extreme irony.

                  Give it up, you're convincing no one. Stop embarrassing yourself.
                  still think it was a good decision to sign with hearn? Clueless!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
                    I'm supporting the truth you idiot.

                    Projecting doesn't make you look clued up about the sport, it sticks out like a sore thumb and convinces no one. Only casuals call others that to make it look like they're long time fans of the sport. Which i am as i've been watching from pretty much 1990. You clearly have only come on board recently. It shows in the most horrible way.

                    There's a pandemic on you f3cking cabbage. That changes things very clearly. Duh. The can fight was go until all this happened. Duh. get it now? Duh.

                    You still didn't answer how Warren would do differently if Warrington was still with him? Nor did you get the fact you're supporting Warren with unfounded nonsense that you refuse to try and answer in a fit of extreme irony.

                    Give it up, you're convincing no one. Stop embarrassing yourself.
                    Hahaha hahaha The matchroom casual is a laughing stock! He should of stayed with Warren! Like I said!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP