Would Floyd still be undefeated if he had fought..

[edgarg]

Found innocent by who?

He was voted unanimously to have his license revoked 7-0.

That is not being found innocent.

IRON (Block)HEAD DAN, you obviously haven't read my post. The legal Documents from the enquiries are FREE to read on the internet. I read every single word that was written at that very time, and what I'm telling you is accurate and truthful. It was merely a used flimsy gauze pad, exactly like a new gauze pad, except that it was USED. If you can't accept ,TRUTH, you are no better that the rest of that brainless lemming follow-the-leader mob.

I always thought you had good sense. USE IT.

The microscopic elements of P and P (2) found only by using a high-powered Electron Microscope, were commonly used in nearly ALL cosmetics, and were also to be found in every kitchen on the Globe. (Most likely just a grain of talcum powder). This is straight from the legal documental finding.

READ the Legal Documents. If there was not such a fuss to upset Margarite with common boxing head tactics, nothing would have been said about it. The Commissioner who was the first to inspect the pad said "it was just an ordinary used gauze knuckle pad, with a couple of water or sweat spots on it.""


READ the LEGAL EVIDENCE..... You know damned well why Margarito was found innocent only because fo the fuss so the Commission said, "you are the captain of your ship" and he got that 1 year minimum suspension.

I don't know why I waste my valuable time arguing with nincomdreks

[3rdcharlotwin]

Hell no! Floyd couldn't even beat Maidana in their first fight. Floyd is still undefeated because he CHOSE not to fight the best. None of the biggest names he fought were at their best either, which include Gatti, De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Mosley, Pacqiuao ect.
Floyd is a true cherry picking, ducking puss!

[edgarg]

Why was he convicted and outed for 2 yrs ?

That's another LIE. He was given "the most lenient suspension for 1 year" only becaue the ignorant mob were thirsting for blood. As an excuse (which was widely know to be) they said that his suspension was "because you are the captain of your ship", and if you don't undestand what that means, ask your 6 year old sister.

The Commission found him "INNOCENT" of knowing anything about it. READ the DAMNED LEGAL FINDINGS and stop wasting my time.

[Roadblock]

That's another LIE. He was given "the most lenient suspension for 1 year" only becaue the ignorant mob were thirsting for blood. As an excuse (which was widely know to be) they said that his suspension was "because you are the captain of your ship", and if you don't undestand what that means, ask your 6 year old sister.

The Commission found him "INNOCENT" of knowing anything about it. READ the DAMNED LEGAL FINDINGS and stop wasting my time.

Sounds like they thought he was guilty but couldnt prove it in legal terms.

[Roadblock]

Hell no! Floyd couldn't even beat Maidana in their first fight. Floyd is still undefeated because he CHOSE not to fight the best. None of the biggest names he fought were at their best either, which include Gatti, De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Mosley, Pacqiuao ect.
Floyd is a true cherry picking, ducking puss!

He wasnt at his best when he fought them, Floyd is older than Manny, let that sink in sunshine.

[3rdcharlotwin]

He wasnt at his best when he fought them, Floyd is older than Manny, let that sink in sunshine.

Great logic Sunshine! Floyd is older than Manny, which means Gatti, De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Mosley & Pacqiuao were all in their prime when Floyd chose to fight them lol

[Roadblock]

Great logic Sunshine! Floyd is older than Manny, which means Gatti, De La Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Mosley & Pacqiuao were all in their prime when Floyd chose to fight them lol

It means they all fought in the same era and in about the same form with only a few years give and take between them all, I hope that didnt go over your head but I think it might have.

[edgarg]

Sounds like they thought he was guilty but couldnt prove it in legal terms.

Maybe it sounds like that to YOU and other like you, but to logical responsibly thinking people they read the legal documental evidence. It's all there, everything I've posted on this, and not for the first time either. I've had this ongoing item since the issue began.

Did you know that Arum, Margarito's Promoter, who backed him unswervingly all the time, sued the Commission in Court, to "show any evidence of any harmful material in Margarito's wraps". They couldn't, so didn't appear, and Arum won by default.

As I already have said several times today alone, on this matter, I read EVERY single word of every legal document, even of article I saw, on the subject. So I KNOW...! !!!

Please, for a change, accept MY word.

[Roadblock]

Maybe it sounds like that to YOU and other like you, but to logical responsibly thinking people they read the legal documental evidence. It's all there, everything I've posted on this, and not for the first time either. I've had this ongoing item since the issue began.

Did you know that Arum, Margarito's Promoter, who backed him unswervingly all the time, sued the Commission in Court, to "show any evidence of any harmful material in Margarito's wraps". They couldn't, so didn't appear, and Arum won by default.

As I already have said several times today alone, on this matter, I read EVERY single word of every legal document, even of article I saw, on the subject. So I KNOW...! !!!

Please, for a change, accept MY word.

Its very hard to accept your word because I seen the fight, I seen Cottos head falling apart like a hammer hitting a tomato, I remember thinking wtf is going on Margarito has never punched this hard before or after that night, something went on .

[edgarg]

Its very hard to accept your word because I seen the fight, I seen Cottos head falling apart like a hammer hitting a tomato, I remember thinking wtf is going on Margarito has never punched this hard before or after that night, something went on .

I'll tell you something else, which is well known and you can find on the internet. Because of Jack Dempsey's manager, Jack Kearns, had written a book (he was dead broke) asserting that he put Plaster of Paris on Dempsey's wraps and dipped his hands in a bucket of water before the fight, the boxing experts decided to experiment . Boxing Illustrated sponsored it.

So the Plaster story was decided by experts to have been a total lie. and impossibility.

They duplicated what Kearns had said, and carefully dried the boxer's wraps over 4-5 hours in a thermostatically controlled oven, to replicate the conditions at the time of Dempsey. The
Boxer who took part was Cleveland Williams, a HUHE KO Puncher. This was in the early or mid 1960s. He his the heavy bad about twice before the plaster crumbled to mostly dust, with a few tiny shards, which Williams said would have damaged his hands if he continued.

In fact, it has now been debunked that Willard suffered any serious damage from Dempsey. He was just overwhelmed by Dempsey's ferocity so early. He only suffered a slightly cut eye at the outside left corner, and a couple of bruises.

The photo of Willard smiling away at the reporters whilst giving them an interview the VERY NEXT day, at noon, sitting in his open tourer with his wife and their luggage shows NO damage. They were on their way to drive back home, over 700 miles away.

That picture says ALL.