Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ioka: Tattoos Have Nothing To Do With Boxing, I Hope To Chip Away At JBC Rule
Collapse
-
Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Postehhh it's ****** in the sense that they allow guys who fight out of Japan (Linares for example, has fought out of and trained out of Japan his entire career) have tattoos but not guys of Japanese nationality.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostYour sentiment screams of ignorance of someone not travelled and uncaring of another country’s culture. I’d expect it from someone that’s never left their own backyard.
I don’t agree with the rule however it doesn’t make it “******.”
And Ioka is part of the same culture that doesn't think it's ******, but he seems to think it's ******. I'm sure there are others of the culture who agree with Ioka.
Comment
-
It's ironic that Japan, probably the most secular country in the world, where religious bigots have no place, is at the same time so anally retentive when it comes to something insignificant like tattoos
So tattoos are forbidden because japanese gang members wear tattoos. Imagine that
That **** happens everywhere!
I guess latino countries should start banning tattoos because of the maras
Last edited by lopetego; 01-07-2021, 09:52 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Yodpayak View PostIt may be the style of his tattoo. Its a sleeve tattoo popular with gangs and criminals. The writing on his ribs look fine.
He's got a western type lion.
Japan lion tattoo looks like a dragon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75 View PostYour sentiment screams of ignorance of someone not travelled and uncaring of another country’s culture. I’d expect it from someone that’s never left their own backyard.
I don’t agree with the rule however it doesn’t make it “******.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sosay View PostNo bro, it is ****** and screams of hypocrisy. I understand if that's the rule but make it the rule for everyone. It doesn't make them too uncomfortable if they allow outsiders to do because it brings money.
Guys like Linares (if he has tattoos) are exempt from this rule because the public largely assumes foreigners to be ignorant of local culture and history, and therefore they can be excused for the transgression.
But boxing, a western sport, is relatively new to Japan. Some traditional martial arts cultures maintain longstanding, entrenched attitudes regarding social etiquette. A guy I know at work, a caucasian, went to Japan to study kendo (contemporary form of sword fighting). He visited one dojo (practice hall) where he was welcomed for his interest and invited to join the class. All went well until they saw the tattoos on his forearms. He was politely asked to leave.
Comment
-
Am sure they would drop this rule soon, if the Supreme Court already handed down a rule that it is no longer a crime to have a tattoo without a medical license, then am sure this rule would be on the way to been dropped by the JBC.
I think it’s more of a moral thing than anything else. Sometimes we are a victim of our own culture.
Comment
-
Why did they allowed Mike Tyson fight in Japan. That rule made JBC ****** and should be abolished.
Comment
-
Originally posted by komandante View PostWhy did they allowed Mike Tyson fight in Japan. That rule made JBC ****** and should be abolished.
Different countries have different traditions, different customs. Some countries will find certain things offensive that would be fine in another country.
If Japanese audiences find tattoos on Japanese fighters offensive (which apparently is the case), then the rule does make sense.
Comment
Comment