Sugarhill interview with Fred

**REDEEMER** · 01-05-2021, 01:29 PM

He was stumped at how dumb people are . He was probably more stumped why he went on that platform but decided to put them in check anyway when he said you cannot call Fury a cheater when it also would include him as well as Jay Deas . He also educated them on why the camera was shut off as that is for the fans not the actual process and protocol putting on the gloves with the athletic commission involved in the room .

**TernceBudCharlo** · 01-05-2021, 01:31 PM

Originally posted by REDEEMER

He was stumped at how dumb people are . He was probably more stumped why he went on that platform but decided to put them in check anyway when he said you cannot call Fury a cheater when it also would include him as well as Jay Deas .

Not necessarily. Even if you don't think that Fury cheated in the Wilder 2 fight, how do you deny that Fury has been a dirty cheater in the past?

**REDEEMER** · 01-05-2021, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

Not necessarily. Even if you don't think that Fury cheated in the Wilder 2 fight, how do you deny that Fury has been a dirty cheater in the past?

One and the other has no relevance or relation what Wilder has claimed . You have to be a real mental case to even go along with any of his claims . Ha

**TernceBudCharlo** · 01-05-2021, 01:35 PM

Originally posted by REDEEMER

One and the other has no relevance or relation what Wilder has claimed . You have to be a real mental case to even go along with any of his claims . Ha

That's not true though. One of the callers pointed out how if this were in a court of law, the judge would have to consider his past actions. It's common sense really, if you cheat in the past you're more likely to cheat in the fugue.

**REDEEMER** · 01-05-2021, 01:39 PM

Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

That's not true though. One of the callers pointed out how if this were in a court of law, the judge would have to consider his past actions. It's common sense really, if you cheat in the past you're more likely to cheat in the fugue.

That caller has no real experience in anything law . To get a case you would have to prove the current accusations with reasonable or plausible truth to what you are accusing someone of which only then can you pile on more evidence of possible tampering . However the current accusations would have no relation to what Fury is being accused of which is water tampering, missing padding, egg weights ( can’t have both ) ,outside interference of signaling to have the towel thrown in , a drunk referee on the side of Fury etc..etc.

These accusations would actually get the case dismissed rather quickly and the judge would look how far apart these came and how they were created as time went on ,not after the fight which team Wilder went silent on for months . Ha

**TernceBudCharlo** · 01-05-2021, 01:41 PM

Originally posted by REDEEMER

That caller has no real experience in anything law . To get a case you would have to prove the current accusations which only then can you pile on more evidence of possible tampering . However the current accusations would have no relation to what Fury is being accused of which is water tampering, missing padding, egg weights ( can�t have both ) ,outside interference of signaling to have the towel thrown in , a drunk referee on the side of Fury etc..etc.

These accusations would actually get the case dismissed rather quickly. Ha

Even Sugarhill himself admitted that in all of his years of boxing, he had never seen anyone's head dented the way Wilder's was. Not saying all of these things are true but there was foul play and we deserve to know the truth.

**REDEEMER** · 01-05-2021, 01:46 PM

Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo

Even Sugarhill himself admitted that in all of his years of boxing, he had never seen anyone's head dented the way Wilder's was. Not saying all of these things are true but there was foul play and we deserve to know the truth.

“It was discovered by doctors that my brother has a dent in the side of his head due to a blunt object struck against his head from his last fight. “No glove or fist was able to cause the damage according to the autopsy”

Autopsy ? Ha

If Wilder had actually had medical proof he wouldn’t be posting it on social media ,he would have documentation of fractures etc ....and have attempted a court case .

The truth is that pic of Wilder is actually due to the lighting and his cheekbones indentation most likely. But that would never hold up ,you can’t just say or use anyone’s statement of they never seen a dent like that otherwise physical proof of documentation which Wilder doesn’t have wouldn’t be needed . Wilders own brother could just walk into court and make the same claim,case closed right ? No not at all . Ha

**Motorcity Cobra** · 01-05-2021, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by REDEEMER

He was stumped at how dumb people are . He was probably more stumped why he went on that platform but decided to put them in check anyway when he said you cannot call Fury a cheater when it also would include him as well as Jay Deas . He also educated them on why the camera was shut off as that is for the fans not the actual process and protocol putting on the gloves with the athletic commission involved in the room .

I don't believe in glovegate but he had no problem being on that show. When Fred told him only 1 more question he said he's there as long as he wants and he started reading questions from the chat.

He enjoyed himself.

**TernceBudCharlo** · 01-05-2021, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra

I don't believe in glovegate but he had no problem being on that show. When Fred told him only 1 more question he said he's there as long as he wants and he started reading questions from the chat.

He enjoyed himself.

He seemed very uncomfortable discussing any of Tyson Fury's past. Idk if glove gate is true or not, but I think it's not disputable that Fury has done some bad ****,

Sugarhill interview with Fred