Who "legitimized" the WBO?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gnostic19
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • May 2005
    • 344
    • 19
    • 0
    • 6,707

    #1

    Who "legitimized" the WBO?

    If i remember right, Holmes gave credence to the IBF by fighting for and winning their title when he was in his prime. Again, if my memory serves me was it DLH that fought for and won a WBO belt when he was a lightweight and thus put that organization on the map?
  • Dye
    2 Live and Dye in LA
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 16464
    • 1,485
    • 3,540
    • 25,312

    #2
    Camacho? i dont know

    Comment

    • Nautilus
      ...
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2004
      • 6083
      • 402
      • 761
      • 13,468

      #3
      In HW division, Vitaliy Klitschko, Chris Byrd, Wladimir Kltischko, and Lamon Brewster have legitimized the WBO belt.

      Comment

      • gnostic19
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2005
        • 344
        • 19
        • 0
        • 6,707

        #4
        oh yeah...him too. ****, i tried to forget everything about that dude.

        Comment

        • neils7147933
          Boxingscene Icon
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 16261
          • 946
          • 2,279
          • 26,752

          #5
          Wasn't it HBO and Showtime and publications acknowledging it as a world title belt that did it?

          DLH having the belt in the mid 90s probably helped its cause.

          The WBA LOSING legitimacy probably helped it recently, as well as unification matches where the WBO champion wins over one of the other big 3 like in Corrales-Castillo I or Calzaghe-Lacy

          Comment

          • cupcrazy01
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 2082
            • 70
            • 96
            • 12,104

            #6
            Well, when Wlad Klitschko was the WBO Heavy champ during Lennox's reign, you didn't hear very many people saying there was more than one champion, but then he lost it to Sanders, go it back somehow and then lost it again to Brewster...then it was a legit piece of the heavyweight title? I was confused by this and still am...

            Comment

            • gnostic19
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2005
              • 344
              • 19
              • 0
              • 6,707

              #7
              It was well-known a couple of years before that, though. But yeah, they have helped to secure it as a recognized organization...whatever that's worth.

              Comment

              • Nautilus
                ...
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 6083
                • 402
                • 761
                • 13,468

                #8
                Originally posted by Nautilus
                In HW division, Vitaliy Klitschko, Chris Byrd, Wladimir Kltischko, and Lamon Brewster have legitimized the WBO belt.

                ... and probably Sergei Liakovich.

                Comment

                • mECHsLAVE
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 1419
                  • 137
                  • 105
                  • 7,736

                  #9
                  I agree with most mentioned, plus Michalczewski as the reigning WBO champ at 175, unified the WBA and IBF to go with his WBO, and when the sanctioning bodies played dirty pool and stripped him immediately, then the WBO title became THE title at LHW for many years, and is still to this day technically the linear champion (Erdei).

                  Comment

                  • Abe Attell
                    Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 2226
                    • 75
                    • 0
                    • 8,860

                    #10
                    I think it might have been George Foreman, though I may be wrong: wasn't this the only belt he kept after giving up the other belts so that he wouldn't have to fight the number #1 contenders of the other belts? I might be wrong though since I can't keep track of all these alphabet belts...if correct, at least in America...in Europe, not sure, everybody seems to favor this belt so they didn't have to fight Americans , except of course LENNOX LEWIS

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP