Does Floyd have a single win as good as Pac’s win over Bradley?

[Truth Seeker]

Don’t say Pac or Nelo because they weren’t prime when Floyd fought them.

Bradley was:
Prime (31yo)
Undefeated
Top P4P
Had beaten: Marquez, Vargas, Alexander, Peterson, Rios, Casamayor, Holt, Witter, Vazquez, etc.

And no catchweight.

Which prime fighter did Floyd beat that was as good as prime Bradley?

[FeFist]

This thread makes no sense.

Pacquiao is a greater fighter than Bradley. Mayweather beat Pacquiao after and before Pacquiao beat Bradley.

To answer your question, Mayweather's victory over Pacquiao is better than Pacquiao's victory over Bradley.

[mxtali]

Corrales?

Aside from the point, the bradley win is very underrated. I remember back then people were criticizing Pacquiao bc Bradley was moving up in weight lol. Mostly floyd fans but still. That was the absolute best opponent Bob could have gave Manny.

[buge]

This thread makes no sense.

Pacquiao is a greater fighter than Bradley. Mayweather beat Pacquiao after and before Pacquiao beat Bradley.

To answer your question, Mayweather's victory over Pacquiao is better than Pacquiao's victory over Bradley.

Just because fighter A beat fighter B, that doesn't mean fighter A gets credit for all of fighter B's wins. Triangle theories don't work.

Mayweather gets a lot of crap for having big names that were all past prime or green. So an easy answer would be a prime, undefeated fighter who Mayweather beat that is better than Bradley. Hatton maybe? Corrales? Canelo was not prime.

[Noelanthony]

Don’t say Pac or Nelo because they weren’t prime when Floyd fought them.

Bradley was:
Prime (31yo)
Undefeated
Had beaten: Marquez, Vargas, Casamayor, Alexander, Peterson, Holt, Witter, Vazquez, etc.

Which prime fighter did Floyd beat that was as good as Bradley?

You must have woke up today and thought well if I can’t get any Christian louboutins I will just get some red k off my fellow posters.

[Noelanthony]

Just because fighter A beat fighter B, that doesn't mean fighter A gets credit for all of fighter B's wins. Triangle theories don't work.

Mayweather gets a lot of crap for having big names that were all past prime or green. So an easy answer would be a prime, undefeated fighter who Mayweather beat that is better than Bradley. Hatton maybe? Corrales? Canelo was not prime.

Yet good enough to beat Bradley even at that time. Should that not count then?

[Roadblock]

Just because fighter A beat fighter B, that doesn't mean fighter A gets credit for all of fighter B's wins. Triangle theories don't work.

Mayweather gets a lot of crap for having big names that were all past prime or green. So an easy answer would be a prime, undefeated fighter who Mayweather beat that is better than Bradley. Hatton maybe? Corrales? Canelo was not prime.

Bradley's biggest wins were ?

Bradley is not an elite fighter he is Porters level maybe, even thats pushing it a little.

Cotto Mosley Canelo possible the undefeated Hatton ALL beat Bradley.

[djtmal]

Hatton is on par.....

[bloodyknuckles]

That green Canelo that Mayweather beat was definitely better than Bradley. Cotto was also better.

[Robbie Barrett]

He has many. Timmy wasn't that good. Pac stans like to hype Timmy up because Timmy avoided most of the WW division and doesn't have the losses he would have had if he fought the other top fighters.