Don't forget the chumps tuning in and spending their money on this pantomine, they play their part in disrespecting the sport too.
Comments Thread For: Logan Paul: Canelo is Salty He Lost & I Get Chance To Beat Mayweather!
Collapse
-
was not mayweather caught PROVEN using IV DRUGS against Berto?Yes! wAS NOT hE CAUGHT AND hE EVEN SAID TO hbo WAS USING pSYLOCAINE IN HIS KNUCKLES? ye That's why he stop fighting with HBO.was not Mayweather who said He was doing Blood doping 2 weeks before Canelo fight called vampire facial explaining what the process was to re inject the plasma of your own blood under your eyes to oxygenate and get more stamina?YES so who is dirty now?Comment
-
Are you people about Paul beating accomplished pro boxers much less the No.1 boxer in the world? These YouTubers are a walking-talking freak show. Tell me your post is a joke of some kind.Nate Robinson is way bigger than floyd and like I said Logan Paul is BOUT DAT LIFE I see this ending badly for Floyd nelo wants it’s as “sparring” so no cameras show the beatdown. Logan bout dat life paul ain’t a washed up Kovalev pulling punches or callum u beat up my brother smithComment
-
Comment
-
“Contrary to Mr. Hauser’s inaccurate reports, [a USADA official] was in the home and observed Mr. Mayweather’s condition that precipitated the need for an IV. The [official] was also in the home when the paramedic was called and remained in the home while the paramedic provided the IV. At no point during the infusion did Mr. Mayweather attempt to hide anything regarding the treatment he was receiving.was not mayweather caught PROVEN using IV DRUGS against Berto?Yes! wAS NOT hE CAUGHT AND hE EVEN SAID TO hbo WAS USING pSYLOCAINE IN HIS KNUCKLES? ye That's why he stop fighting with HBO.was not Mayweather who said He was doing Blood doping 2 weeks before Canelo fight called vampire facial explaining what the process was to re inject the plasma of your own blood under your eyes to oxygenate and get more stamina?YES so who is dirty now?
“Mr. Mayweather’s use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at that time and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today.” - Los Angeles TimesComment
Comment