Question for the Bud Haters

[kidbazooka1]

Callum smith was #1 why, because he beat Chinny George Groves? Who carl Froch already beat the s*** out of twice, who got destroyed by Badou Jack, and won a vacant belt?

You just can’t see it or just don’t want to but ask any rational human being Indongo is garbage and nowhere near callums levels lol

Just give it up man I get it you want a black fighter to be the best Floyd was the best before canelo now it’s canelos era and when his is done it may be another black fighter or another Mexican fighter or another white fighter who knows but no need to lie to yourself to make yourself feel better.

[kidbazooka1]

You say that but you still haven't answered my question or said anything about why Callum is any better than those guys - who did he beat that was so good to earn those belts?

Are you blind or slow?

Ring magazine champ
#1 in his division
Super six champ

****tts on anything those bums you mentioned ever done.

Now just stop man you’re making yourself look bad.

[Roadblock]

Fine, but if you say that then you also have to say that Callum, Kovalev, GGG, Fielding, Jacobs were shot to **** cuz none of those guys looked near their best going into their fights with Canelo.

Callum how do you figure he was shot ? same for GGG Jacobs .

Kov definitely past it but he didnt fight a CruiserW he fought a MW.

Fielding out of his depth not shot.

Shot and not at best are two different things.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Are you blind or slow?

Ring magazine champ
#1 in his division
Super six champ

****tts on anything those bums you mentioned ever done.

Now just stop man you’re making yourself look bad.

You still can't answer the question. Ring magazine belt means s*** when you don't beat anyone good for it. No, he didn't win the super six, Andre ward won the super six. Callum Smith won the WBSS, which was a tournament filled with bums.

[TernceBudCharlo]

You still can't name a single name on Callum Smith's resume that's any better than those guys I named.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Also, the Iceman was ranked #1 by the ring over Bud going into that fight.

[kidbazooka1]

You still can't name a single name on Callum Smith's resume that's any better than those guys I named.

Hahahaha wow you are one of those thick headed Mfers. Lol

All I gotta give you is one name groves who was considered a muck better win than shot to ****tt Lucas who never even won a title but knowing you’re stubborn ass you’ll keep with but but but but .
Get help man.

[TernceBudCharlo]

Hahahaha wow you are one of those thick headed Mfers. Lol

All I gotta give you is one name groves who was considered a muck better win than shot to ****tt Lucas who never even won a title but knowing you’re stubborn ass you’ll keep with but but but but .
Get help man.

You're wrong again. Matthyse was a -255 favorite against Postol.

Smith vs. Groves was even money. See the links below I'm not making this **** up.

https://www.sportsbetlistings.com/boxing/lucas-matthysse-vs-viktor-postol-betting-odds-and-prediction/7999/

https://www.sportsbetlistings.com/boxing/george-groves-vs-callum-smith-betting-odds-and-prediction/13040/

[Roadblock]

You still can't name a single name on Callum Smith's resume that's any better than those guys I named.

He was a British WC and undefeated that makes him a target for any top guy, the brits coming up dont have the big names on their resume doesnt mean they not quality fighters.

As I said there is NOBODY in the history of boxing that doesnt have low rent names on their resume, nobody can fight the best one after the other they would have a very short career if they did, its just not how boxing works, most top guys will fight maybe 5-10 top guys over there career, the rest they fill in to make money and keep busy.

How about you name a guy that has never fought any low rent guys ?

[TernceBudCharlo]

He was a British WC and undefeated that makes him a target for any top guy, the brits coming up dont have the big names on their resume doesnt mean they not quality fighters.

As I said there is NOBODY in the history of boxing that doesnt have low rent names on their resume, nobody can fight the best one after the other they would have a very short career if they did, its just not how boxing works, most top guys will fight maybe 5-10 top guys over there career, the rest they fill in to make money and keep busy.

How about you name a guy that has never fought any low rent guys ?

The guys Bud beat were World Champs and undefeated too! SMDH. I only made this thread cuz people hate on Bud 24/7 while hyping up everything their guys like Canelo and Pacquiao do. And can't even see that they're so blinded by their hate for Bud that they don't realize a win over Smith is no more impressive than a win over Postol, Indongo, Horn etc.