Almost every "Comments Thread For" i've seen, there are a ton of posters who ask 'why is Fighter A bringing up Fighter B.'
This happens daily.
Like if a boxer is just going to call Cliff Rold or Keith Idec to tell them how they feel about another fighter.
Posters who can't tell that the article is an interview and the fighter is being asked specific questions argue semantics. Like "Why is he talking about him? He needs to fight so and so".
It takes away from the discussion.
I've been urging boxingscene to change interview articles into a Q & A format. It will create better discussions and not 20 posts of fans asking why is the fighter/trainer/promoter making these comments about said fight...Well because he was asked that question. Some of you really can't deduct that on your own, and Q&A's should be for those posters.
This happens daily.
Like if a boxer is just going to call Cliff Rold or Keith Idec to tell them how they feel about another fighter.
Posters who can't tell that the article is an interview and the fighter is being asked specific questions argue semantics. Like "Why is he talking about him? He needs to fight so and so".
It takes away from the discussion.
I've been urging boxingscene to change interview articles into a Q & A format. It will create better discussions and not 20 posts of fans asking why is the fighter/trainer/promoter making these comments about said fight...Well because he was asked that question. Some of you really can't deduct that on your own, and Q&A's should be for those posters.
Comment