Spence beats every version of Mayweather

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GrandpaBernard
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 17156
    • 4,480
    • 2,947
    • 114,399

    #31
    Originally posted by Carpe Diem
    The blueprint to beating Crawford or Spence is outside range and counter-punching. They’re both good boxers, I think Crawford is a bit better than Spence in terms of his versatility on offense, but Spence is sharper with his punches. Overall, they’re not close to being on Floyd’s level in terms of overall skills and brilliance inside the ring no matter how hard fans and media experts desperately try to overhype them.
    Terence and Errol are very good fighters in a transitional phase of boxing

    They pass the time until the next truly great talent comes along: Pernell, Roy, Floyd, etc

    Comment

    • Carpe Diem
      Seize the day
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 16022
      • 1,232
      • 996
      • 44,413

      #32
      The accuracy and follow through to land punches as often as he WANTED to was something that Crawford and Spence don’t possess in their arsenal. They have a hard time creating openings against basic caliber opponents.

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47370
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #33
        Originally posted by Bandman
        Porter would've given prime Floyd hell too. Porters style is Floyd's nightmare all rolled in one. pressure, jabs, relentless, awkward, iron chin... so theres no shame in Spence "scraping" by


        Porter may have given Mayweather more grief than Spence imo

        these kids will find boogiemen who would have beaten Floyd for YEARS

        when Crawford beats Spence... that conversation will turn to him... and Spence will no longer be that boogieman

        I can DEFINITELY see that happening LMAO



        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
        Porter is no joke.


        and Mayweather is... ?



        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
        Floyd barely beat Maidana. Are you new in boxing?


        a very unintelligent/casual-fan type comment

        in fact judging by that... you are probably one of the many observers who DKSAB, but talk anyway lol

        FACT: Maidana was a OBVIOUS cherry-pick

        when first announced, insiders knew that fight ******, idiot casual-fans did not

        Maidana landed that fight because gullible shltheads thought that Broner was on Mayweathers level, and called for that fight after Maidana spanked Broner

        Team Mayweather saw Maidana as a un-skilled plodding punchbag... which he was to a certain degree, especially when compared to Mayweather...

        they viewed Maidana as a look-good showcase opponent... Mayweather had heard all the casual-fan talk about "runner" etc, and was looking to expand his legacy... so they picked a name opponent who would be there to hit... Maidana was supposed to be Floyd's "Gatti-at-147"

        THEY SAW HOW EASILY DEVON ALEXANDER BEAT MAIDANA... AND THEY SAW HOW BAD BRONER'S TACTICS/EXECUTION WERE ON THE NIGHT

        you probably need to read the bold again, it was typed big just for you... especially the part about how EASILY Alexander exposed Maidana

        I did remember to use the word " exposed "... right ?

        Maidana performed better than expected, that is what you saw... but this is what you didn't see

        FACT: Mayweather fought Maidana flat-footed in the first fight
        FACT: Mayweather boxed on his toes in the rematch

        seriously kid... how could you claim to know Mayweather, and yet not notice that?

        when Mayweather took him seriously, Maidana was never in the fight.... so stop being ridiculous

        Comment

        • Madison Boxing
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 35364
          • 6,455
          • 3,367
          • 190,590

          #34
          floyd would probably beat him but it still would have been too much risk for floyd and hed never have fought him if they were around the same time.

          Comment

          • Madison Boxing
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2015
            • 35364
            • 6,455
            • 3,367
            • 190,590

            #35
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime
            Porter may have given Mayweather more grief than Spence imo

            these kids will find boogiemen who would have beaten Floyd for YEARS

            when Crawford beats Spence... that conversation will turn to him... and Spence will no longer be that boogieman

            I can DEFINITELY see that happening LMAO







            and Mayweather is... ?







            a very unintelligent/casual-fan type comment

            in fact judging by that... you are probably one of the many observers who DKSAB, but talk anyway lol

            FACT: Maidana was a OBVIOUS cherry-pick

            when first announced, insiders knew that fight ******, idiot casual-fans did not

            Maidana landed that fight because gullible shltheads thought that Broner was on Mayweathers level, and called for that fight after Maidana spanked Broner

            Team Mayweather saw Maidana as a un-skilled plodding punchbag... which he was to a certain degree, especially when compared to Mayweather...

            they viewed Maidana as a look-good showcase opponent... Mayweather had heard all the casual-fan talk about "runner" etc, and was looking to expand his legacy... so they picked a name opponent who would be there to hit... Maidana was supposed to be Floyd's "Gatti-at-147"

            THEY SAW HOW EASILY DEVON ALEXANDER BEAT MAIDANA... AND THEY SAW HOW BAD BRONER'S TACTICS/EXECUTION WERE ON THE NIGHT

            you probably need to read the bold again, it was typed big just for you... especially the part about how EASILY Alexander exposed Maidana

            I did remember to use the word " exposed "... right ?

            Maidana performed better than expected, that is what you saw... but this is what you didn't see

            FACT: Mayweather fought Maidana flat-footed in the first fight
            FACT: Mayweather boxed on his toes in the rematch

            seriously kid... how could you claim to know Mayweather, and yet not notice that?

            when Mayweather took him seriously, Maidana was never in the fight.... so stop being ridiculous
            the rematch was close too, clown. 115-112 on one card and 116-111 on the others. all floyd did was jab and run

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30530
              • 2,196
              • 921
              • 105,596

              #36
              Originally posted by Madison boxing
              floyd would probably beat him but it still would have been too much risk for floyd and hed never have fought him if they were around the same time.
              True, Floyd should have fought spence and thurman as people can claim they'd beat Floyd and Floyd didn't prove otherwise when he could have.
              They were future superstars of the sport

              Comment

              • HewJohnson
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2019
                • 4354
                • 404
                • 2
                • 125,484

                #37
                The only fighter that beats Floyd is a prime Pacquiao, that’s why he ducked him. Oh and JLC.

                Comment

                • blowblow
                  #1 Blow by Blow Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2019
                  • 2419
                  • 196
                  • 287
                  • 24,162

                  #38
                  Originally posted by HewJohnson
                  The only fighter that beats Floyd is a prime Pacquiao, that’s why he ducked him. Oh and JLC.
                  100% facts. everyone should know and accept it.

                  Comment

                  • Dakuwaqa
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 8349
                    • 2,313
                    • 614
                    • 30,959

                    #39
                    Originally posted by HewJohnson
                    The only fighter that beats Floyd is a prime Pacquiao, that’s why he ducked him. Oh and JLC.
                    PAC was closer to prime in their fight and was two years younger.

                    Comment

                    • Madison Boxing
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2015
                      • 35364
                      • 6,455
                      • 3,367
                      • 190,590

                      #40
                      Originally posted by hugh grant
                      True, Floyd should have fought spence and thurman as people can claim they'd beat Floyd and Floyd didn't prove otherwise when he could have.
                      They were future superstars of the sport
                      yeah, floyd thought berto was a better choice of opponent unfortunately

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP