TBRB loses ALL remaining credibility, ranks Inoue #1 P4P

[_Rexy_]

Stop. Ducking. The question.

What NAMED fighters has Inoue beat, other than Donaire?

Since you want to be phallic about it, the reason I want you to answer that is so I can embarass you with the next question.

Inoue has NO quality, NAMED wins other than Donaire. That is the correct answer.

So, the next question is, why do they have Usyk, who damn near lost to a tough but faded Chisora, #4 over guys like Teofimo, Fury, Spence?

Usyk's placement and Inoue's placement are clearly someone heavily biased over at TBRB.

P4P is subjective, but what these guys write holds weight.

Why would that question embarrass me? Just because you don't know the names on his resume doesn't mean actual boxing fans and boxing writers and the people at TBRB know them. He's fought eight different former world champions. It's nobodies fault but yours that you don't know their names.


And why do you keep name dropping Fury? Most people who have been following boing longer than two years know that Heavyweights don't go in P4P rankings

[_Rexy_]

Like he KO's 50 year old Donaire??? GTFOH

He should have knocked out Donaire. Hit him with a body shot and the ref stepped between them while Donaire went to the corner then took a knee. should have been a ten count.

[Madison Boxing]

his resume is even worse than 'buds' which is saying something. the hype around this guy and the double standards is something else, when frampton won damn near every round off donaire it got shrugged off as nothing because donaire was 'past his best'. when inoue goes life and death with him a couple years later it was proof of inoues greatness he damn near got exposed by a pensioner and people want to see hes p4p level? who has he beat? can someone please tell me who has the beat?

[Scopedog]

I thought Donaire was controversial???

Not really. It was a competitive fight and Donaire deserves a lot of credit for a spirited underdog challenge but most people thought Inoue clearly won.

[Shadoww702]

Not really. It was a competitive fight and Donaire deserves a lot of credit for a spirited underdog challenge but most people thought Inoue clearly won.

But should P4P#1 really be in a "spirited" fight with someone so far beneath them? Maybe it was just an off nite.

I put Canelo higher. He fought the P4P #1 twice. #3, #9.

Lara and Trout were P4P top 20 at the time.

I believe Kov. Was too 20 also?

In the end every one has a p4p list and it's just that

[techliam]

‘Remaining credibility’?

Can you qualify this odd perspective please, you’re making out as if TBRB has been losing credibility for some reason, when they have not done anything to warrant that ?

If you mean losing credibility to you, that’s entirely different. What you see as credible is only as relevant as you

That being said, I agree with TBRB, though there are solid arguments for Canelo to be there also, which is probably the majority view

[_Rexy_]

But should P4P#1 really be in a "spirited" fight with someone so far beneath them? Maybe it was just an off nite.

I put Canelo higher. He fought the P4P #1 twice. #3, #9.

Lara and Trout were P4P top 20 at the time.

I believe Kov. Was too 20 also?

In the end every one has a p4p list and it's just that

Pretty sure Ring and TBRB had Donaire ranked #2 at 118 going into that fight

[Combat Talk Radio]

...

Most people who have been following boing longer than two years know that Heavyweights don't go in P4P rankings

I deleted the Inoue fanboyism. You're not reasonable on that discussion so it's moot.

But this...

You just made my case for me.

Last time I checked, Usyk campaigned at...what?

They have him ranked #4.

Last time I checked, Fury campaigned at...what?

They have him ranked #6.


So by your OWN logic they have no credibility, because you say no heavyweights yet they list heavyweights (and that should answer techliam's question about "losing" because as I said, the list is F'd in more ways than just Inoue being #1.

I don't care if you have Inoue Top 10. I care that people honestly think that a guy who has ONE notable name on the resume and is otherwise "eye test" should be #1 over a guy whose resume surpasses everyone else on the list COMBINED.

[_Rexy_]

I deleted the Inoue fanboyism. You're not reasonable on that discussion so it's moot.

But this...

You just made my case for me.

Last time I checked, Usyk campaigned at...what?

They have him ranked #4.

Last time I checked, Fury campaigned at...what?

They have him ranked #6.


So by your OWN logic they have no credibility, because you say no heavyweights yet they list heavyweights (and that should answer techliam's question about "losing" because as I said, the list is F'd in more ways than just Inoue being #1.

I don't care if you have Inoue Top 10. I care that people honestly think that a guy who has ONE notable name on the resume and is otherwise "eye test" should be #1 over a guy whose resume surpasses everyone else on the list COMBINED.

Once again, just because you don't know the names does not mean they aren't names. It just means you don't follow
A)The lower weight classes
B) Boxing in that part of the world

[Combat Talk Radio]

Once again, just because you don't know the names does not mean they aren't names. It just means you don't follow
A)The lower weight classes
B) Boxing in that part of the world

They're not names if they don't independently draw money.

Donaire is the only opponent of Inoue's that draws money on his own.

That's fact, bro.