Comments Thread For: Canelo: Those Who Know More About Boxing - Consider Me P4P Best

[Thuglife Nelo]

All is takes is 1 comment from him in a mail bag where he refers to canelo as a ped cheat for you to start your long useless and inaccurate rant about wada and %s, and weeping about how bread is a racist.

Inconsistency and karma go a long way. Breadman locked himself in a forever paradox. He criticized(s) Canelo for PED use yet acknowledges his current greatness and P4P position. That’s a contradiction isn’t? I don’t need to worry about that. maybe u do!?

Mexican Bidness mayne! We in dis thang mayne!

[Silver Spear]

wow this list sucks.

Thanks for your feedback I will keep that in mind for future potential lists that I make.

Welcome to earth. Is this your first time?

[Jab jab boom]

Thanks for your feedback I will keep that in mind for future potential lists that I make.

Welcome to earth. Is this your first time?

I strongly suggest that there be no future potential lists. Or at least keep them to yourself instead of sharing your lack of boxing knowledge with the entire site.
Boxing fans from earth thank you in advance.

[Jab jab boom]

Inconsistency and karma go a long way. Breadman locked himself in a forever paradox. He criticized(s) Canelo for PED use yet acknowledges his current greatness and P4P position. That’s a contradiction isn’t? I don’t need to worry about that. maybe u do!?

Mexican Bidness mayne! We in dis thang mayne!

it’s not really a contradiction because both can be true. Just look at Holyfield; some would say Roy Jones, or James Toney. In other sports , Barry Bonds. You can be busted for Peds and still be elite. So that’s not a contradiction from bread, it’s more so a case of you having a limited mental capacity.

[techliam]

Inoue for me

Has no asterisks on that resume at all, blasting out top tier opponents in each division. Yes the Donaire fight was competitive but there’s literally zero cases for defeat in his run

Canelo has a solid run of opponents. But I feel he should have lost to Golovkin in 1st fight, and the 2nd one was either way. The Jacobs fight was as competitive as Inoue/Donaire

[Silver Spear]

I strongly suggest that there be no future potential lists. Or at least keep them to yourself instead of sharing your lack of boxing knowledge with the entire site.
Boxing fans from earth thank you in advance.

I suggest you learn how to read and understand what subjective and objective means.

[techliam]

Jermell over Jamal? I personally think they're both top 10, but I rank Jamal higher

How?

Jermell has proven himself as the kingpin at 154, and was very unfortunate to get that loss... I used to criticise Jermell for being the weaker sibling but he has consistently proven me wrong. He’s doing what great champions should do

Jermall has stalled his career at middleweight, arguably losing to Korobov and scraping fights against D’chenko. He has been there since mid-2017.

Pair with the fact that Middleweight is one of the weakest divisions in the sport, and 154 is arguably the strongest

The difference is night and day

[Jab jab boom]

I suggest you learn how to read and understand what subjective and objective means.

subjectively, your list sucks...but if I’m being objective, your list sucks.

[Bandman]

Pacquiao is #1 PFP.

1. Pacquiao
2. Canelo
3. Crawford
4. Usyk
5. Spence

[techliam]

Pacquiao is #1 PFP.

1. Pacquiao
2. Canelo
3. Crawford
4. Usyk
5. Spence

Genuine question

Why would you rank Spence so high? Is Porter rank 6 in your list, because that fight was 50/50. Outside of Porter you have a very competitive fight with Brook, ending because of a pre-existing injury, Mike Garcia and Danny Garcia

that’s the entirety of fights worth considering. That isn’t a top 5 P4P resume to me. With Crawford people aren’t sure how good he is as no one has really tested him, so he has that unknown factor (I disagree with him ranked so highly, but can understand). We know Spence’s level, and that is Brook/Porter level