AJ vs fury to announced saturday
Collapse
-
I don’t think Fury will be ringside, I also think it’s probably not a good idea because if Joshua lost, it would make him look very ****** and show that they were looking past PulevComment
-
AJ has no reason not to vacate the WBO if he wants the Fury fight that much. Fury has said he does care what belts are on the line as he has won them all anyway.
It would be nice to have every belt on the line, It’s not going to make or break the fight though.Comment
-
The fight should be for undisputed title.
Joshua is not vacating any of his belts 'Therefore he will face Usyk next'.Comment
-
i favour fury but joshua is a lot better than given credit for. people need to realise that the first top 5 heavyweight who got there hands on wilder would have demolished him just as easy. hes useless/Comment
-
No one cares about Usyk and he can’t do anything if they decide to fight next.
Doubt It! Usyk likely next, Usyk made it very clear he is NOT Stepping aside and if AJ wants to go fight Fury then he will have to do it without the WBO Belt. Also Usyk not happy with his team as well as Eddie Hearn, he too said it was issues with Gloves as well as switching the Ring Size Felt like they wanted him to lose to get him out of that Mandatory Spot
Usyk is usually smiling and joking around but he was very serious in this Interview
Boxers are allowed one voluntary after a mandatory and AJ can always ask WBO for that exception if he wants. Boxers don’t fight back to back mandatories.
WBO is political and Warren and Arum have a lot of vested interest in the body. So if AJ vs Fury gets made - they will tell WBO to put Usyk on ice. And there’s absolutely nothing he can do about it. He’ll moan like Whyte did for 1000days.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Wished Hearns would’ve had this same energy when Wilder wanted to fight Joshua 2 years ago.
All I heard from him was excuses, smhComment
Comment