Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson-Roy Jones: Embracing Curiosity
Collapse
-
-
I'm still trying to work out what category I belong to.
I suppose it depends on how much 'they' insult my intelligence. I can be any one of those categories Cliff was mentioning, and even some that fit in-between.
That was Karl Marx's biggest problem. Trying to squeeze everybody into a socio-economic category, when there were some who just didn't fit, and then when the 1848 ******* revolutions didn't turn out to be the 'proletariat revolution' he spat the dummy.
Nothing to do with this article of course, it's a good reminder not to take boxing too seriously when it's appropriate. Good advice Cliff.Comment
-
Really? Men didn't wear ponytails or lipstick in the 80's or 90's? I don't know what rock you've crawled out from under but men were dressing in drag and putting on makeup long before the mid 80's. Little Richard wore lipstick in the 50's for christ's sake. How about the New York underground Andy Warhol scene of the 60's?
Hehe, yeah like men were real men before then...wearing trousers hanging slack so your underwear shows was a sign from 1920's prison that you were a 'cat'. Or ready if you know what I mean.
I don't have any proof to back that up, but some of our greatest icons weren't exactly the Marlboro man.Comment
-
Yeah I read that list of rules on here the other day and it like completely took the wind out of my sails. Was that BS or those are the rules? I like both guys and wish them well, but not so much I'm gonna' give them money for nothing.Hopefully no shenanigans takes place prior before the fight where they change to b.s rules with two sided conflicting reports. People are paying a lot of money to see a winner ,they should be refunded if in fact the commission ruling is no knock downs or knockout allowed.Comment

Comment