Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pulev: I Will Expose Joshua To The World For A Second Time

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    More lip flapping

    Comment


    • #72
      Pulev: I Will Expose Joshua To The World For A Second Time



      It's all about the talking
      Call outs solve everything, too

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
        Haha...

        Calzaghe beat...

        Hopkins
        Reid
        Sheika
        Woodhall
        Lacy
        Kessler
        Eubank
        Mitchell
        Veit x2
        Bika
        Jones Jr
        Brewer

        Now check the resumes that every one of your fighters have today. Realise the delusion you're filled with little boy.

        Yes, clowning you. Although to be fair, you're really clowning yourself. I'm just pointing out to you the nonsense you spew constantly.

        Point out when Eubank ducked the rematch with Saunders?

        Eubank lost to someone? You mean like Charlo has too? Your ******ity should be illegal, that's how embarrassing it is.

        A shot Trout competed you idiot. A way past his best Korobov at 5 days notice beat him. At worst, Eubank pushes Charlo close. At best, he takes care of him. Like so many Brits take care of you cowards.

        When could Eubank give him the rematch you plum? Korobov is fighting this weekend, and Eubank hasn't been in the ring since. You're the one who needs to slap himself.

        Check the ingredient that got Saunders stripped, it was Amphetamine. Not a PED.

        When did Haye fail a test? Answer the question.
        Charles Brewer was nothing special. Lacy was a good win. Roy was 77 when Joe finally found the sack to fight him. Veit was domestic level trash (Joe beat him, then fought him again a few fight later why????). Reid was a decent win, but he never fought outside the UK. Ah yes...the immortal Omar Sheika. Bika was nothing more than a very rugged journeyman. Eubank was faded when Slappy Joe fought him. Richie Woodhall was special only to you UK cheap beer drinkers. Kessler was actually his best win, but it took him 40+ fights to finally get in the ring with someone that good.

        Is that the best you've got, Beta Boy? Your boy Joe's resume had more padding than a good bra. The sad thing is that incels like you will continue defending his sad record. What are you gonna pull out of your little arse next, "Josh Taylor is P4P #1!"??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

        Eubank Jr. is fighting who next? Your gardener? He could have the Charlo fight anytime he wants it. He does not want it.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by BlackR0bbb View Post
          Charles Brewer was nothing special. Lacy was a good win. Roy was 77 when Joe finally found the sack to fight him. Veit was domestic level trash (Joe beat him, then fought him again a few fight later why????). Reid was a decent win, but he never fought outside the UK. Ah yes...the immortal Omar Sheika. Bika was nothing more than a very rugged journeyman. Eubank was faded when Slappy Joe fought him. Richie Woodhall was special only to you UK cheap beer drinkers. Kessler was actually his best win, but it took him 40+ fights to finally get in the ring with someone that good.

          Is that the best you've got, Beta Boy? Your boy Joe's resume had more padding than a good bra. The sad thing is that incels like you will continue defending his sad record. What are you gonna pull out of your little arse next, "Josh Taylor is P4P #1!"??? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

          Eubank Jr. is fighting who next? Your gardener? He could have the Charlo fight anytime he wants it. He does not want it.
          "Charles Brewer was nothing special" Great reasoning there. No, seriously. You should become a public speaker you articulate yourself so well.

          Brewer was a good world class fighter. You don't need to be special. If that was the case, not one of your fighters would have any wins of substance. Every fighter in history wouldn't mean anything because the greats build their legacy on mostly good fighters. The more they beat, the greater they become. That's how it works.

          Roy was only 2 years older than Joe. It was Joe's last fight before he retired. And he did so as the away fighter. He was years past his best himself. You'd have a point if he was prime and in the middle of his career. But he wasn't. Jones turned down 2 offers to fight Joe. That's a fact. No counter offers were made. But Jones ducked too many people to mention. Don't make me dominate you on this subject, child. I'm already knee deep inside your arse as it is.

          Veit has a good win over Braehmer. That makes a win over him as good. The rematch happened because Veit had got himself back into the mandatory slot. Calzaghe couldn't get fighters into a ring with him as the number 1 and with a world title. It would have been worse if he dropped the title because he didn't want the rematch with an already beaten foe.

          Any fighter that doesn't fight outside of their country is poor in your eyes? You must have serious disgust over most Americans then. But you're wrong. Reid went to Germany and dominated Svenn Ottke. It was one of the worst robberies in history if you want to take the time to watch that crime. Reid was deducted points just for hitting Svenn with a clean punch. He won his title in Italy. Had a few in the US. So you clearly don't have a scooby what you're talking about.

          Sheika has a win over Glen Johnson. So, yes, He was a good win. Hyped like crazy back then until Joe beat the shlt out of him.

          Eubank wasn't prime, but he was only a bit past his best. He was 31, not 50. That was a great win. That was Joe's first fight at world level after Collins decided it would be better to walk away from the sport than have Joe smack him about. So in stepped Eubank for the vacant title.

          Woodhall was a former world champ. He was good. But you wouldn't know anything about him because you're clueless about the sport and it's history. Know about the subject you're talking rubbish about otherwise you'll make a fool out of yourself. WON'T YOU????

          Hopkins was his best win. not Kessler.

          Joe proved to be a great fighter with a great resume. Regardless of the bitter morons who spew their bitter hate because of insecurity after shouting their mouth off and getting embarrassed. Just like you're doing with every sad post you make. And i haven't even started yet.

          Charlo wanted to fight Eubank instead of Chenko? You're contradicting yourself there. Eubank is ready whenever. It's Charlo who decides if he gives him a shot. Not Eubank. So it's nothing but your delusion.

          Now tell me which of your fighters have worthwhile wins at world level? Going to run away from this question again?

          Comment


          • #75
            Any Pulev sightings since the loss ?

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post
              "Charles Brewer was nothing special" Great reasoning there. No, seriously. You should become a public speaker you articulate yourself so well.

              Brewer was a good world class fighter. You don't need to be special. If that was the case, not one of your fighters would have any wins of substance. Every fighter in history wouldn't mean anything because the greats build their legacy on mostly good fighters. The more they beat, the greater they become. That's how it works.

              Roy was only 2 years older than Joe. It was Joe's last fight before he retired. And he did so as the away fighter. He was years past his best himself. You'd have a point if he was prime and in the middle of his career. But he wasn't. Jones turned down 2 offers to fight Joe. That's a fact. No counter offers were made. But Jones ducked too many people to mention. Don't make me dominate you on this subject, child. I'm already knee deep inside your arse as it is.

              Veit has a good win over Braehmer. That makes a win over him as good. The rematch happened because Veit had got himself back into the mandatory slot. Calzaghe couldn't get fighters into a ring with him as the number 1 and with a world title. It would have been worse if he dropped the title because he didn't want the rematch with an already beaten foe.

              Any fighter that doesn't fight outside of their country is poor in your eyes? You must have serious disgust over most Americans then. But you're wrong. Reid went to Germany and dominated Svenn Ottke. It was one of the worst robberies in history if you want to take the time to watch that crime. Reid was deducted points just for hitting Svenn with a clean punch. He won his title in Italy. Had a few in the US. So you clearly don't have a scooby what you're talking about.

              Sheika has a win over Glen Johnson. So, yes, He was a good win. Hyped like crazy back then until Joe beat the shlt out of him.

              Eubank wasn't prime, but he was only a bit past his best. He was 31, not 50. That was a great win. That was Joe's first fight at world level after Collins decided it would be better to walk away from the sport than have Joe smack him about. So in stepped Eubank for the vacant title.

              Woodhall was a former world champ. He was good. But you wouldn't know anything about him because you're clueless about the sport and it's history. Know about the subject you're talking rubbish about otherwise you'll make a fool out of yourself. WON'T YOU????

              Hopkins was his best win. not Kessler.

              Joe proved to be a great fighter with a great resume. Regardless of the bitter morons who spew their bitter hate because of insecurity after shouting their mouth off and getting embarrassed. Just like you're doing with every sad post you make. And i haven't even started yet.

              Charlo wanted to fight Eubank instead of Chenko? You're contradicting yourself there. Eubank is ready whenever. It's Charlo who decides if he gives him a shot. Not Eubank. So it's nothing but your delusion.

              Now tell me which of your fighters have worthwhile wins at world level? Going to run away from this question again?
              Mario Veit was a domestic level scrub. Sheika was special only to you and Woodhall looks good in a blazer. Your Revisionist History is quite amusing.

              Hopkins was not Joe's best win. Kessler was. Hopkins-Calzaghe was so boring, my brain started bleeding watching it. Between Bernard's mugging for the cameras and Joe's slaps, it was one of HBO's worst fights ever. Kessler was a strong, young, elite super middleweight from Denmark who was Top 10 at the time. He fought a decent fight, but made the mistake of not using his jab enough. That was the one night I was very impressed with Slappy Joe.

              Crawford went to the UK and smacked Ricky Burns. Tank Davis went over there and squashed one of your fighters. Prograis got robbed vs. Taylor. Andrade went to Germany and washed Culcay. American fighters have no problem going over there to smack some cheeky Euro.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by BlackR0bbb View Post
                Mario Veit was a domestic level scrub. Sheika was special only to you and Woodhall looks good in a blazer. Your Revisionist History is quite amusing.

                Hopkins was not Joe's best win. Kessler was. Hopkins-Calzaghe was so boring, my brain started bleeding watching it. Between Bernard's mugging for the cameras and Joe's slaps, it was one of HBO's worst fights ever. Kessler was a strong, young, elite super middleweight from Denmark who was Top 10 at the time. He fought a decent fight, but made the mistake of not using his jab enough. That was the one night I was very impressed with Slappy Joe.

                Crawford went to the UK and smacked Ricky Burns. Tank Davis went over there and squashed one of your fighters. Prograis got robbed vs. Taylor. Andrade went to Germany and washed Culcay. American fighters have no problem going over there to smack some cheeky Euro.
                Is this pathetic list of nobodies Americans have wins over because i said "You must be disgusted by MOST Americans"??

                Try reading next time, sweetheart.

                The excitement doesn't even come into it when talking the quality of a win. Yes, the Hopkins fight was boring, but it's still clearly a better win than Kessler, even though Kessler was a great win.

                Ricky Burns was shot at that point.

                Walsh was a nobody.

                Only a few idiots think Prograis won the fight. Nearly everyone accepts that Taylor won. But considering your pathetic overseas win column, i'm not surprised to see you put a loss as a "Robbery". You're the kind of sad case to do so.

                Andrade beat who now? Hahaha. That's cute. Must hurt to not really have anything of worth historically in boxing overseas so have to come up with slops.

                Not one win of worth there for you. And this is while we're on the subject of resumes and you calling world class fighters as nobodies. Irony at it's finest. But what else have you got? Haha.

                Now answer the question... Which of your fighters out there have wins you consider to be credible?

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP