If u don't quit making them FightHype ass titles. Lol. "Stern warning" lol
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Shawn Porter: STERN warning for Terence Crawford
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostYes. I'm glad you understand.
This has NOTHING to do with PBC, bro. Not a damn thing.
I'm a Fury fan, I'm a Jamel Herring fan, I'm a Regis Prograis fan (now that he told Crawford the truth), and I'm a Sebastian Formella fan.
I'm also a fan of Spence because he's proven himself, and I'm a fan of Porter because nobody has dominated him and he always comes to fight. HE above every fighter gives you your money's worth every damn fight.
It's funny. If this were ANY OTHER FIGHTER running through C-levels, they would get criticized to the high hell, but just because this guy is able to knock out washed up (Brook), damaged (Khan), crippled (Benavidez) and unknown (Kavaliauskas) guys, he's supposed to have done enough to earn a shot at the top guy in the division.
Yet when Brandon Rios who did the SAME DAMN THING earned a shot against Manny, people criticized Rios as not having done enough.
When Bradley who did the SAME DAMN THING got a shot against Manny, people criticized Arum for Manny's poor competition.
But for some reason it's different with this guy.
You're exposed, bro. You're biased for Crawford and you're not a real fan. A REAL fan would understand - Crawford HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING AT WELTERWEIGHT TO EARN A SHOT AGAINST THE TOP GUY!!!!
I want champion vs champion, you don't. I'm so glad you have exposed me for wanting titles unifying while you don't.
I have no probem with Crawford V Porter, Porter is a good fighter and will give Crawford work. But Crawford wants to face the divisions other 2 champs and I'd rather have that above anything else. I HAVE BEEN EXPOSED. just not sure what as.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post
I want champion vs champion
I want that too - when it's a CREDIBLE champion facing a CREDIBLE champion. Otherwise the roles are reversed and it's Crawford (as Spence) vs. Indongo (as Crawford).
Why is that okay? It's not!
Originally posted by DaNeutral. View PostI have no probem with Crawford V Porter, Porter is a good fighter and will give Crawford work. But Crawford wants...
What the fans should have and what they should demand is that fighters TEST themselves. We should NOT want lopsided or questionable fights. We don't know how good Crawford is. Until we do, we should not be filling his head with this notion that he's on a level playing field with Spence.
Spence has already proven to us who he is. At this point the only thing that might hold him back is his car wreck. He's stopped PRIME guys who had never been stopped, he went OVERSEAS to take belts, he's sold out arenas. That's confirmed. We know he's a draw. We know he's the real deal.
All we know of Crawford is, if you're a B-level or below, you're not getting out alive. Okay...? We don't know with an A-level fighter how he performs. He might go timid. He got might dropped (Kavaliauskas did it). We just don't know. WE NEED TO FIND OUT before he goes against Spence.
Picture: That fight gets booked, Spence washes him in six.
What's NSB and the media going to say?
"Well, Crawford was overrated"
"I mean we really didn't know how good Crawford was..."
"Who'd Crawford beat?"
Because remember, that's exactly what happened with Spence/Algieri and it's exactly what happened with Wilder/Fury. Exactly what happened with Loma/Rigo.
Why go through that again? Why not just let the F'n guy fight a top level guy other than Spence first - just ONE - so we can test him on the same level as the others?
THEN we can talk about whether a Spence fight makes sense based on how Spence looks after the Danny fight.
What if Swift sparks Spence out cold? You still want Crawford to fight Spence? It'd make no damn sense. Especially since Porter beat that same Danny!!
Comment
-
For the life of me, why are people so enamored with Porter? He's a mauler/brawler with limited boxing skills that Brook handled easily.I guess being under that PBC umbrella gives him some exposure.Aside from Pac obviously,and maybe Spence,the rest are a bunch of Tito Jacksons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cracaphat View PostFor the life of me, why are people so enamored with Porter? He's a mauler/brawler with limited boxing skills that Brook handled easily.I guess being under that PBC umbrella gives him some exposure.Aside from Pac obviously,and maybe Spence,the rest are a bunch of Tito Jacksons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mister Wolf View PostThrows flea bites. Alot of wild movement and wild swinging with no power to back it up. Not even enough to bruise his opponent's face. Add that to him headbutting guys accidentally on purpose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nino brown21 View PostHe almost beat Spence . wobbled him . he almost beat Thurman . hurt him to the body .he beat Danny Garcia . beat broner beat berto . that's pretty damn good for someone who only throws flea bites with no power
Comment
-
Originally posted by revelated View PostTHIS, ladies and gents, is how you sell a fight.
Because you know everything he's saying, he believes. Which means he'd put his whole heart and soul into that WBO mandatory fight.
Comment
Comment