How can ESPN call Crawford #1 P4P and at the same time....

[boliodogs]

ESPN said “the best fighter in the world is still looking for that mark key opponent.” Even my girlfriend who doesn’t really watch boxing looked at me and asked how the best fighter in the world is still looking for a good opponent? Crawford is not #1 pound for pound, and I don’t see a case for him to be above Canelo. You can even argue that Teofimo could even go above Crawford on the list at this point.

They are not trying to be fair or accurate. They will always make an ESPN boxer number 1 PFP.

[Pigeons]

ESPN said “the best fighter in the world is still looking for that mark key opponent.” Even my girlfriend who doesn’t really watch boxing looked at me and asked how the best fighter in the world is still looking for a good opponent? Crawford is not #1 pound for pound, and I don’t see a case for him to be above Canelo. You can even argue that Teofimo could even go above Crawford on the list at this point.

Wasn't that the same criteria for Golovkin? Were you crying then?

I got Canelo #1 and Crawford #2 btw.

[Bandman]

He beat Horn the guy that whipped GrandPac.

[baroidi]

their commentators, especially Tessitore, is terrible to listen to, all they do is over hype Crawford, Lomachenko and Fury during their broadcast. It's like they are so insecure that know that they don't actually have the best pool of talent, that they have to scream "P4P #1" "Lineal Champion" every few minutes.

[Billycostigan]

He beat Horn the guy that whipped GrandPac.

"Whipped" GrandPac? I'm sure you really don't believe that. Pacquiao clearly beat Horn in that fight and was outwrestled by a dirt horn and outright robbed by the 3 judges.

[Madison Boxing]

hes not even in my p4p number 5, hes beaten absolutely noone, proven absolutely nothing and that bum dropped him last fight.

[RHETOЯIC]

It is hard to look good against Postol. The fight was scored appropriately. Close win for Ramirez.

I like Postol but he brings no special effects.

What do you mean by no special effects?

That's that Mayweather-talk all his boys adopted once they heard him use it.

Postol made a Matthysse quit.

[RHETOЯIC]

Ya'll boys want to be him.

[_Rexy_]

It is hard to look good against Postol. The fight was scored appropriately. Close win for Ramirez.

I like Postol but he brings no special effects.

Special Effects? Who gives a **** about special effects? He's a top 140 pounder and myself (and a lot of guys in the fight chat) scored it for Postol, or a draw.

[STREET CLEANER]

What do you mean by no special effects?

That's that Mayweather-talk all his boys adopted once they heard him use it.

Postol made a Matthysse quit.

Postol is a solid fighter. Only top fighters are going to beat him. But he is a B+ fighter that doesn't get over the hump.

I already mentioned that besides the Lucas fight.