Originally posted by Oregonian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford's Wish List: Pacquiao Would Be No. 1; Spence Right After That; Garcia, Thurman
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by South Champion View PostAfter going 12 rounds with Spence, Mikey dropped and won a decision against Vargas. He's now better acclimated to the weight. Mikey still isn't a natural welterweight though. I was just pointing out how Mikey says he's determined to become a champ at 147, but never mentions fighting Crawford.
Ok. But if he did mention Crawford, would you see that as a better fight than Crawford vs Spence/Porter/Thurman?
Garcia is never going to beat any WW. Thats my point
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post-
Ok. But if he did mention Crawford, would you see that as a better fight than Crawford vs Spence/Porter/Thurman?
Garcia is never going to beat any WW. Thats my point
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doubledagger View PostI'm a Spence fan, but you're a hypocrite.
Spence said the same thing when Custer asked him, he said he wants to fight Danny, Pacquaio, and then Terence Crawford.
If you have no respect for Crawford because of what he said, then you should have no respect for Spence either.
Spence has fought better competition than Bud, and that's what it matters to me. Words are cheap and don't mean anything till they are not backed up.
Can't call me a hypocrite because I never judged them both by what they have said, I've only judged them in the opposition department.
Comment
-
yeah the 41 year old man would be his first choice wouldnt itthis guy is a damn fraud and you lot all buy into it, he has beaten absolutely nobody!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ca$ual Fan View PostYou're the one with issues. You're obsession to hate is bad
So you're making only Pac accountable for holding the division but not Spence or Crawford? Look at this LMAO
Why TF do you care if Pac vacates the belt or not? Ugas has the other belt. Spence and Crawford can go unify with Ugas and still becomes the undisputed as soon as Pac vacates and retires, or he may decide to fight the one who comes out on top.
He's a Mayweather fan I can respect. You're someone I can't. Just an obsessed hater who still fixates the JMM KO replay who I'm sure you're not a fan of.
Lemme guess - Pac beat Thurman
Therefore, gonna hate Pac and Thurman
None of this gibberish you just spewed makes any sense what so ever.
Ps. No real boxing fan recognises the regular belt dumb ass. You're really jumping over hoops of fire just to justify this unjustifiable bulshieet.
We all know there are many roadblocks to the Spence vs Crawford fight just like there were for the Pac vs Mayweather fight.
But there are ABSOLUTELT NONE for the Pac vs Spence fight.
There is only ONE reason that fight aint happening.
Manny is quacking like a duck.
Lol, did you actually just try to make this about me hating on Thurman coz he beat Manny?
Lol, I hated that clown way before that. Fakest fighter I ever seen.
I see Manny has taken a page out of his book though.
The coward went all the way from Filipines to Texas to watch Spence vs Mikey because he thought Spence was gonna lose.
Said he'd fight the winner but when he saw what Spence did to Mikey he tried to run out of there and Spence had to Mike check him.
He been running ever since.
Drop the belt fool.
Oh and for the record, aint nobody give AF about your respect. Phaq outta here!
Comment
-
Originally posted by South Champion View PostMikey is not a better fight than Spence/Porter/Thurman. My point is that Spence, Porter, Thurman, Danny, and Mikey all complain that Crawford hasn't done anything at WW and he needs to earn a shot at them, but in the time that Crawford has held his WW belt, they've all fought at least one opponent that was clearly below Crawford's level & beltless.
Ummm, not quite true. Thurman fought PAC
Spence fought an always live wire in Porter and win a close decision.
Spence is fighting DSG next.
Look at the last three guys Crawford is fought.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Doubledagger View PostDefaq is this shieet? Dog you need some help, ASAP!
None of this gibberish you just spewed makes any sense what so ever.
Ps. No real boxing fan recognises the regular belt dumb ass. You're really jumping over hoops of fire just to justify this unjustifiable bulshieet.
We all know there are many roadblocks to the Spence vs Crawford fight just like there were for the Pac vs Mayweather fight.
But there are ABSOLUTELT NONE for the Pac vs
Manny is quacking like a duck.
Lol, did you actually just try to make this about me hating on Thurman coz he beat Manny?
Lol, I hated that clown way before that. Fakest fighter I ever seen.
I see Manny has taken a page out of his book though.
The coward went all the way from Filipines to Texas to watch Spence vs Mikey because he thought Spence was gonna lose.
Said he'd fight the winner but when he saw what Spence did to Mikey he tried to run out of there and Spence had to Mike check him.
He been running ever since.
Drop the belt fool.
Oh and for the record, aint nobody give AF about your respect. Phaq outta here!
Just to add to that - Mannys playbook is to fight guys coming off losses (Rios, Broner, Mathysse, Mosley, Clottey) or catchweights (Cotto, Margarito, Oscar, Marquez) or guys that are irrelevant (Horn, Algieri, and the next guy).
Typical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———
Ummm, not quite true. Thurman fought PAC
Spence fought an always live wire in Porter and win a close decision.
Spence is fighting DSG next.
Look at the last three guys Crawford is fought.
They fight weak competition between fighting each other.
So basically, they're saying Crawford hasn't proven himself enough to fight them, but he's too good to be their inbetween fight.
They discredit Crawford while promoting fights against opponents that are universally ranked well below Crawford.
Comment
Comment