Kell brooke is the best fighter crawford will face.

[_original_]

Always felt Benavidez is very underrated. I know he hasn’t done sht, but just his performance vs Crawford, how skilled he showed himself to be, no reason for me to believe he couldn;t apply that vs other opponents of that lvl. I think even one-legged Benavidez could’ve beaten a prime Brook.

No way, Benavidez was outboxed easily and received a gift against Herrera. Him boxing competitively with Crawford says more about how overrated Crawford really is.

The Brook that beat Porter wouldn't lose a round to Jose and say that as a fan of the Benavidez bros.

[RadChang]

Go bet your money on Brook then if you think he is good. You make tn doallars for ever dollar you bet IF Brook wins. Postol is better than Brook. Mean machine is better than Brook. Gamboa was better when he fought Crawford than Brook is now.

Mean machine better than Brook? Shut your dumb ass up

[Truth Seeker]

Postol is better than Brook.

Postol is a 140lber you fcking rtard. There is no way you can even compare him to Brook.

[BLASTER1]

hes done, i can promise you if crawfords team didnt think brook was finished then they wouldnt be fighting him. brooks got a name but that doesnt elevate him above the rest of the slop that crawfords fought at welterweight, then again crawfords not exactly looked like a million dollars himself recently, got dropped by that bum in his last fight so maybe brook might put him on his arse too and the guy with one knee gave him some problems too from what i remember

Cmon bro its high level pro Boxing.
Most guys fighting at this level get knocked down once or twice but its what they do after the kd that counts.
What do you expect to see a guy never losing a round, never getting touched and said fighter to knock out all opponents.

[JakeTheBoxer]

If Brook is still able to come strong at 147, it will be a long night for Crawford.

[SplitSecond]

No way, Benavidez was outboxed easily and received a gift against Herrera. Him boxing competitively with Crawford says more about how overrated Crawford really is.

The Brook that beat Porter wouldn't lose a round to Jose and say that as a fan of the Benavidez bros.

He didn’t get outboxed easily. I rewatched that fight recently and it was competitive all the way through (I’m talking about the Crawford fight here). Herrera also wasn’t a bad fighter, I’m not sure Benavidez’s fight with Herrera was much more of a gift as Danny Garcia’s, who I remember getting really beat up at points in that fight, much worse than the young Benavidez who moved down to 140 to fight Herrera.

Brook has created something with not fighting anyone inbetween the top fighters in Porter, Golovkin, Spence. Outside of those guy’s Benavidez is of higher level in Brooks resume. And I see how he walks into punches, especially vs longer fighter’s, even in his prime. Brook does not have great defense. And he’s always been flatfooted. I can’t think of much or anything that Brook does better than Crawford, maybe he can muscle Benavidez inside and tire him or get a bomb through to stop him, but besides that, I’ve never been so wrong to pick a loser in a one-sided fight, so I’m confident in a competitive fight at least in this mythical matchup. I do think Benavidez was a better fighter by the time the Crawford rolled in, despite the bum leg. More mature.

[KidDinamita]

It's still the best fighter he fought.

If he fights Sugar Ray Leonard, it will be the best fighter he fought, but still Leonard is over 60 years old.

Kell Brook's best days are way behind him.