no, wilder isnt the 'best of the rest'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #1

    no, wilder isnt the 'best of the rest'

    even still im seeing people overhyping him saying furys the only person who could beat him. its ****ing hilarious, most the damn forum said fury was overrated, 99 percent of the forum said he couldnt stop wilder, but now he beat the crap out of bum squad hes superman, and the only fighter who could beat the amazing deontay wilder
    when was the last time you saw a supposed world level fighter beaten that badly? you really gonna watch that fight and think that wilders still the 2nd best fighter in the division? he looked completely out of his depth.
    over here we knew for years he wasnt up to much and was gonna fall flat as soon as he fought a decent heavyweight. i mean how could you watch his fights and think he was world class? it was hilarious watching them, him losing rounds to some fat old out of shape pbc fighter and then one of his ****** swings clipping them at some point.
    once fury had got in shape he walked through this 'monster' like he was absolutely nothing, one of easiest fights hes ever had. this guy would get absolutely hammered by any of the top 5.
  • JakeTheBoxer
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2014
    • 21259
    • 4,663
    • 2,806
    • 123,960

    #2
    I have seen Fury as a top guy since he beat Klitschko. So I don`t know what are you talking about.

    Wilder lost to the best. Losing to the best`t doesn`t mean anybody beats you.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP